FF7_Yuffie Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Unfortunaterly, there's not much information--the seller doesn't usually deal with dinosaur fossils and has had it instorage for over a decade, so the only info available is that it's a Hadrosaur egg, from China and cretaceous with shell loss to one side. No more specific as to location/formation. Length = 17.5 cm Weight = 4.3 kg So, what do people think about it? Now, I was wondering, could the base be hiding some damage/a hole? The base looks a bit off to me, like it's been added---is it a common bit of fakery to make a partial egg look complete by applying a base to them and could that be the case here? Thanks for any help and opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadlandTraveller Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Its real but rough condition and missing a fair bit of shell. I wouldn't invest in this. If the seller has it at a price thats basically giving it away sure, but don't spend any amount of real cash on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FF7_Yuffie Posted October 26, 2020 Author Share Posted October 26, 2020 1 minute ago, BadlandTraveller said: Its real but rough condition and missing a fair bit of shell. I wouldn't invest in this. If the seller has it at a price thats basically giving it away sure, but don't spend any amount of real cash on it. Cheers It's cheaper than most on the market, which is why it caught my eye. But perhaps it might be better saving up for a really good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pemphix Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 Imho: No location/formation = no (scientific) value. Furthermore remind the export ban of fossils from China.... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HamptonsDoc Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 Looks like parts are real but lots of composite on this one on the discolored areas. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snolly50 Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 On 10/26/2020 at 9:34 AM, FF7_Yuffie said: Now, I was wondering, could the base be hiding some damage/a hole? The base looks a bit off to me, like it's been added---is it a common bit of fakery to make a partial egg look complete by applying a base to them and could that be the case here? Almost all eggs seen have a "hole" hidden by the matrix base. This is natural. It is the hatching window from which the dino emerged. The surface we perceive as the "top" of the egg is actually the surface that rested in the nest, while the hidden side was "up." 4 Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, also are remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so. - Douglas Adams, Last Chance to See Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FF7_Yuffie Posted November 23, 2020 Author Share Posted November 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, snolly50 said: Almost all eggs seen have a "hole" hidden by the matrix base. This is natural. It is the hatching window from which the dino emerged. The surface we perceive as the "top" of the egg is actually the surface that rested in the nest, while the hidden side was "up." Wow, ok. I didnt know that. Ive been thinking of them all wrong then, thinking the matrix being the bottom bit. Thanks very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now