Jump to content

Super Sized Tilly Bone?


RescueMJ

Recommended Posts

Supersized Tilly Bone?  Looks like a Large Gummy Bear. Do you agree on the fossil?  Not dense at all. Looks like a sample I have collected already...but this one is very large. 7 cm long, 4.2 cm wide

 

This is a good reference piece. 
 

-Michael

520665F4-21C9-44E9-88B1-B15ADDEDC659.jpeg

493934E5-30A2-460B-AFB5-F88A09032180.jpeg

0D747DB6-8C4B-48BA-9B48-5DF139A17412.jpeg

77826D52-85F9-4C95-93A4-2F8CBE77FEBF.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a gray one very similar from Lee Creek, about 4 cm. It's currently labeled 'unknown'.  Tilly or some type of tympanic bulla?

Its stored away somewhere.  I should have posted it here. Following this 

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello together,

interesting piece.

the second pic looks very symmetric to me. I would say it is from the midline of the skeleton. I have found a recent tillybone of similar size from a catfish in 2019.

Best Regards,

J

Try to learn something about everything and everything about something

Thomas Henry Huxley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're correct on it being a tilly, I have a few just like it

Every once in a great while it's not just a big rock down there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does have the look of a Tilly bone.  MJ says that it is "not dense at all," and that is not a character of a Tilly bone, at least, not of the fossil examples with which I am familiar.  

 

        fish_Tillybone.JPG.494fa302558f5b7327923a631fc1f19b.JPG   

fish_Tilly_xsection.thumb.JPG.5060a846eee8720771a489241e0ffbc0.JPG

  • I found this Informative 4
  • I Agree 1

http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page

 

What seest thou else

In the dark backward and abysm of time?

---Shakespeare, The Tempest

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my comparison example which is not as big. This example is very dense. They are very similar in appearance though. 

 

BDCDA6B2-80E7-47BE-840C-2A8CC8FD1911.jpeg

9580538A-8B6C-4013-836C-653F77FCC631.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm afraid the density, just outweighs any similarity.

I had seen it as porosity, but it's likely about the same measure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m out of town. I’ll add some better photos Friday. 
 

Regardless, pretty cool to see it at surface, brush a little, some more, and recover. Surprising what is under foot. 

F26B63AE-B630-4933-9EC4-E476F5F48B76.jpeg

834FE29F-8C9B-42F2-815B-E89382771DDF.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for fun...  I had my students assist with calculating density today.  The results are in.  Item that is topic of the post has a density of 1.27 g/cm3.  The comparative sample I posted has a density of 1.895 g/cm3. Thanks for your interest.  Look out for my next post on "Indian Artifact?"

-Michael

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...