Jump to content

Brachiopod or maybe coral?


Elkhorn

Recommended Posts

Fossil found in Sierra County New Mexico in a wash located in the Monticello Canyon. Geological determination for this area is documented as Cretaceous - Mississippian.

We have found horn coral and some type of sea sediment rock in the wash. Would like to have an opinion on this fossil embedded in rock.

Fossil.JPG

2038759593_Fossildry.JPG

1548101797_Fossilwet2.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Forum. 

Maybe a stromatolite, or some stromatoporoid? 

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered if it might be stromatolite. I have resource material from the local library listing taxa reported from exposures west of the Rio Grande in the area where this was found.  Stromatolite was not listed.  Perhaps no stromatolite was discovered during the previous excavations. It does have some features that resemble strom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It kinda looks like the inarticulate brachiopod Orbiculoidea to me. At least in the first and third picture. Is the fossil just on the surface like a shell or does it go through the rock?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Elkhorn said:

I wondered if it might be stromatolite. I have resource material from the local library listing taxa reported from exposures west of the Rio Grande in the area where this was found.  Stromatolite was not listed.  Perhaps no stromatolite was discovered during the previous excavations. It does have some features that resemble strom.

Check for "oncolytic stromatolites" (maybe simply "oncolites" on your legends) 

ciao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

stromatolite, or some stromatoporoid?

 

9 hours ago, Elkhorn said:

stromatolite

 

1 hour ago, jikohr said:

inarticulate brachiopod Orbiculoidea

 

36 minutes ago, supertramp said:

"oncolytic stromatolites" (maybe simply "oncolites" on your legends)

That´s a tricky one!

@Elkhorn, are you able to discern if it is 3D or 2D? In other words, do you think its more like a 3D-object (something solid, sphere-like) or more like a 2D-object (something like a "shell")?

First pic looks more like a "shell", other pics more like a "sphere" in its widest sense. Tricky - but that´s good!

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlikely to be a stromatoporoids as they mostly disappeared by the Mississippian. Algal structures such as oncolites and stromatolites are a good guess. What is the rock type? Limestone? Do you see any identifiable clasts or crystals in the rock? Are there any identifiable fossils in the rock other that the purported stromatolites? They also could be fragments of layered cave deposits.

 

 

 

  • I Agree 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...