Jump to content

Unknown shells


JoeGevalt

Recommended Posts

I think that's a no no posting link/ seller info.  Not sure if this one is so someone correct me if I'm wrong. Meanwhile maybe better to just copy/post the picture.

  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this forum one does not have the right to put links to articles of sellers, prices or sellers. You can only put one or more photos and your own text. Thank you for correcting.
 
Coco
  • I Agree 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seller link removed.

 

@JoeGevalt 

Please note that seller links, seller names, and valuations are prohibited on TFF.  Thanks.  

 

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good except it shows the removed link :unsure: I have no idea how you can remove that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need help to figure out what this is. Looks like some sort of shell but seems incomplete 

s-l400-3.jpg

s-l400-4.jpg

s-l400-5.jpg

s-l400-6.jpg

s-l400-7.jpg

s-l400-8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice find! I will guess cephalopod, though I have been on a losing streak as of late and it may spiral further into the matrix. Can you be more specific where it was found and add a picture of it with a ruler so its size can be determined. This will allow you to get the most accurate identification, which I assume is your goal.

 

 Mike

Edited by minnbuckeye
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since this is a duplicate post one of them should be removed so it doesn't get confusing.

  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, minnbuckeye said:

Nice find! I will guess cephalopod, though I have been on a losing streak as of late and it may spiral further into the matrix. Can you be more specific where it was found and add a picture of it with a ruler so its size can be determined. This will allow you to get the most accurate identification, which I assume is your goal.

 

 Mike

Its was found by Mississippi River by twin cities MN, I would say 2 to 3 inches 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don’t know where they come from or how big they are. Personally, I wouldn’t buy them, they’re not in good enough shape. But that’s just my opinion.
 
Coco

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Topics merged. 

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...