Jump to content

North Carolina plesiosaur or shark vertebra?


fossil_lover_2277

Recommended Posts

I just recently found this bone in the Cretaceous Black Creek group deposits of eastern North Carolina. I originally thought it was an oddly shaped shark vertebra, but now I think it might be a worn plesiosaur vert. based on the images I looked up online. The overall cross sectional shape is elliptical, and the center looks much too thick for shark (doesn’t pinch in towards the center). Any thoughts? Thanks!
 

 

6EEAEC54-C58C-4523-9596-6446FEB44264.jpeg

74A27C0B-3F78-41ED-B333-6E27C14BF5F7.jpeg

ACBBE995-F0A1-4379-83FF-0F79E6E204DB.jpeg

04151925-78BB-4FAC-A948-7AA46EB9D3CF.jpeg

47BE0AB0-ACC3-4500-8ECF-C3CEE1B55D4D.jpeg

5B747FBD-9F87-43D5-B2FB-DE390F18C297.jpeg

93843AFC-6B04-4E03-AD04-21642D8D7900.jpeg

2C97B49E-6D3E-4873-88F0-907A11A10988.jpeg

A20BC929-3AB0-406E-B24E-1066BA98B8B2.jpeg

5C339B66-BC87-4083-BDA7-10B5A2588D6E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, frankh8147 said:

It looks like Ray to me!

20211112_085047.jpg

Wow, never seen a ray vertebra before, kinda never thought about it even though they are vertebrates. That’s so cool, thanks!

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hah! Well whaddaya know! If found in any other context I'd have said this was definitely a plesiosaur caudal, as those too often have an elongated shape, are either platycoelous or amphicoelous, would be about this thick, not have subcentral foramina any more, nor parapophyses or hematophyses in the very terminal ones, and may have a notochordal pit. I'd moreover expect rays to have as cartiligenous skeleton, much as the other chondrichthians, and a vertebral barrel marked with struts and depressions, much like other fish, including sharks... But i guess context is everything! :o

 

Still, it begs the question, how would you differentiate a vertebra like this from a plesiosaurian one?

  • I found this Informative 3

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

Hah! Well whaddaya know! If found in any other context I'd have said this was definitely a plesiosaur caudal, as those too often have an elongated shape, are either platycoelous or amphicoelous, would be about this thick, not have subcentral foramina any more, nor parapophyses or hematophyses in the very terminal ones, and may have a notochordal pit. I'd moreover expect rays to have as cartiligenous skeleton, much as the other chondrichthians, and a vertebral barrel marked with struts and depressions, much like other fish, including sharks... But i guess context is everything! :o

 

Still, it begs the question, how would you differentiate a vertebra like this from a plesiosaurian one?

 

3 minutes ago, RuMert said:

Not thick enough for a plesiosaur, looks more ichthyosaurian in 3,6,7. I'd agree with ray

I’ve had several people tell me ray, and several others say plesiosaur as a possibility. I don’t think Brachyrhizodus is particularly common from NC either, based on what Elasmo.com said. Not that plesiosaur is common of course. I do wish there was a definitive way to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RuMert said:

Not thick enough for a plesiosaur, looks more ichthyosaurian in 3,6,7. I'd agree with ray

 

Interestingly, ichthyosaurian was also the first impression I got when I saw the photographs, but hadn't really looked at the vertebral shape yet. Makes sense for a fish vertebra too, of course, to be thin and have a hourglass cross-section. So may be exactly that would be the defining characters based on which you can tell ray from plesiosaur: if it simultaneously looks like a plesiosaurian vertebra and an ichthyosaurian one, it's ray?

 

In any case, hadn't seen anything like this before. Very instructional...! :zzzzscratchchin:

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you may check in my gallery, plesiosaur verts are usually thicker (longer) and can even be twice as long as wide. The only short plesiosaur verts I know of belong to pliosaurs, are cervical and massive in size (this is due to their big heads). Maybe in some Cretaceous deposits (e.g. NC) small short plesiosaur verts are common, but I'm not aware of them

Edited by RuMert
  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, fossil_lover_2277 said:

I don’t think Brachyrhizodus is particularly common from NC either, based on what Elasmo.com said.

Haven’t you found any Brachyrhizodus teeth at your site? I usually find a few when I screen Campanian aged lag deposits in NC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RuMert said:

As you may check in my gallery, plesiosaur verts are usually thicker (longer) and can even be twice as long as wide. The only short plesiosaur verts I know of belong to pliosaurs, are cervical and massive in size (this is due to their big heads).

 

While I agree with you that pliosaur vertebrae are typically - but certainly not always - shorter than those of plesiosauromorph plesiosaurs, I don't agree that plesiosaur vertebrae are typically longer than wide. While this is often, but - even here - not always, the case in elasmosaurs (I've got a couple of surprisingly thin Zarafasaura oceanis vertebrae in my collection, for example), Triassic and Early to Mid Jurassic plesiosaur vertebrae stree certainly not as long. I've got various Jurassic specimens in my collection, for instance, that are shorter than they are wide - the thickest reach about a 1:1 length:width ratio - and this includes caudals. I've even recently seen an American plesiosaur vertebra from Montana that had the exact same shape and thickness as Landon's specimen, but also had the subcentral foramina. So while I think vertebral thickness may be indicative, it's certainly not a determining factor...

Edited by pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon
  • I found this Informative 1

'There's nothing like millions of years of really frustrating trial and error to give a species moral fibre and, in some cases, backbone' -- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Al Dente said:

Haven’t you found any Brachyrhizodus teeth at your site? I usually find a few when I screen Campanian aged lag deposits in NC.

The first time I went to the place was this past Thursday. There were no Brachyrhizodus teeth that I could find, but certainly other typical Cretaceous stuff was present, as well as some other oddities. I’ve never actually found a Brachyrhizodus tooth at any of the Campanian sites I’ve tried

Edited by fossil_lover_2277
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pachy-pleuro-whatnot-odon said:

While I agree with you that pliosaur vertebrae are typically - but certainly not always - shorter than those of plesiosauromorph plesiosaurs, I don't agree that plesiosaur vertebrae are typically longer than wide

I meant longer than the specimen in question:D Longer than wide is about elasmosaurs and Co

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...