Jump to content

deutscheben

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Nimravis said:

Love the microconchids on the sphenophyllum.

Oops, thank you Ralph! Spirorbis was the old ID.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, deutscheben said:

Oops, thank you Ralph! Spirorbis was the old ID.

I like old ID’s. On my pieces that I have glued to cardboard are called Spirobis, I really hate name changes, bring on Edmondia and Pecopteris. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/4/2022 at 8:09 AM, Nimravis said:

I like old ID’s. On my pieces that I have glued to cardboard are called Spirobis, I really hate name changes, bring on Edmondia and Pecopteris. Lol

I agree, Ralph.  Some of the new ids don't make sense.

 

Cheers,

Rich

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stats said:

I agree, Ralph.  Some of the new ids don't make sense.

Have you read the papers where the taxonomy of those old waste bucket genera and species were revised?  Do you believe paleontologists publish nonsense revisions just to be annoying?  "Pecopteris", for one example, has long been recognized as almost meaningless as it contained a large number of unrelated plants.

 

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FossilDAWG said:

Have you read the papers where the taxonomy of those old waste bucket genera and species were revised?  Do you believe paleontologists publish nonsense revisions just to be annoying?  "Pecopteris", for one example, has long been recognized as almost meaningless as it contained a large number of unrelated plants.

 

Don

Some definitely need cleaning up, Pecopteris included.  There are true and seed ferns with the genus Pecopteris.  That is definitely still incorrect.

 

Some of the changes didn't help clear things up.  Edmondia and a few others.

 

And, no I don't think paleontologists publish nonsense.

 

Cheers,

Rich

 

Edited by stats
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have had a few more pieces of flora from the river split over the last month. 
 

First are two Lepidostrobophyllum cone bracts:

 

59741981-962D-4D02-AF14-B4D18D72165C.thumb.jpeg.0e473653a8a12a717af0a2bff10ff3ea.jpeg

 

6C4B131E-36A0-42DB-94E6-78BBBE0F217D.thumb.jpeg.0ad6976eff7e542bb5f770a40f825bff.jpeg
 

I really love the little one, so dainty!

 

23CFFBD1-D053-46B4-A21F-6157C3F9D320.thumb.jpeg.15ec9a386bf99ea7ba36906ebeb9cdff.jpeg

 

Next is a small coprolite:

 

752C5CBB-8DBD-42CA-A295-057467294E3B.thumb.jpeg.03bc77e3dfaedfc6d236785fa7f96637.jpeg

 

And a little piece of plant material with microconchids:

 

9A855F56-7D5F-43F6-A160-3BB4345C873F.thumb.jpeg.1a104df45e651f63cdcf354d55558b86.jpeg

 

2623B0D4-D8BE-447C-837B-5D53E6FF7C32.thumb.jpeg.eb6c3fe83bb7d33751145e30f37a110f.jpeg

 

Here is a partial chunk of  Crenulopteris:

 

5D2C0D18-20E5-4ECD-BAD0-B34248D56628.thumb.jpeg.8e01af7937fb353d503865a1999edd14.jpeg

 

And another different fern- I am not positive on the ID, perhaps Oligocarpia?

 

D392DCDE-F058-4029-A8BF-26FAB02325F5.thumb.jpeg.5aa901a3f1d9033d752a4df675574069.jpeg

 

Finally, this piece has left me puzzled. It has a sort of undulating pattern to it. One possibility is a part of cone like Macrostachya, but I’m not very confident in that. Any thoughts?

 

5EC8B109-1AD7-4105-ABFB-03A118C2A065.thumb.jpeg.15055aa4ab1cd3859c0de21c24326933.jpeg

 

874631E4-3504-4FF0-9E4F-B5A9E00E2234.thumb.jpeg.8c0fb3c4061b489a828f528e358836e6.jpeg

 

ED37C0AB-4137-448F-BF5E-0E4507899399.thumb.jpeg.ef43309564d6e97448b9e76a00aa3cfc.jpeg

Edited by deutscheben
  • Enjoyed 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/5/2022 at 9:43 AM, FossilDAWG said:

Have you read the papers where the taxonomy of those old waste bucket genera and species were revised?  Do you believe paleontologists publish nonsense revisions just to be annoying?  "Pecopteris", for one example, has long been recognized as almost meaningless as it contained a large number of unrelated plants.

 

Don

Don- I just saw this. No, I do not read any papers, let alone all of the Mazon Creek books and publications, and I have a lot of them. I am just a collector of the fossils and the publications, and I spend a lot of time collecting, whacking open concretions and organizing my finds plus the last 2 collections that I recently purchased. With this on my plate, it does not leave much time for anything else. With that said, I know that  they have changed names on a number of fossils and what they are now considered. I still like using the old terminology, except for Edmondia, I have fully embraced Mazonomya mazonensis, mostly because I was at one the Mazon Creek open houses in the early 90’s when they made the change.

Edited by Nimravis
  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2022 at 3:24 PM, deutscheben said:

And a little piece of plant material with microconchids:

I like this association, plants and microconchids;

personally I recently found for the first time a microconchid in the permian deposits in my region, it was a memorable day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, connorp said:

Hmmm. Is the venation clear? Can't tell from the photo.

 
Not particularly I’m afraid:

 

EC03E0AB-F896-4E74-971F-F4C73C6CD6E2.thumb.jpeg.59e92c8bf3947126fd8a7fc9ad386a73.jpeg

 

E056D57B-F4FE-44E2-9039-3B8C1CDAF12A.thumb.jpeg.b3e28e54f31c4f078ae55b5f03b60ca8.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Continuing with river finds, here is another Acanthotelson stimpsoni- this is my best-preserved and largest one yet:

 

ACC05456-71DF-435A-A9CA-433D9B692D38.thumb.jpeg.dd8fc014159fa6506ad8ef494684d166.jpeg

 

218DA1D2-D22C-4F70-8DF5-3C7FEEC666D1.thumb.jpeg.bbb23d0e263e4e0f429ac8f851eebb94.jpeg

 

350F2776-817D-482E-A208-B05C3A9D36D3.thumb.jpeg.719fa68fbe2e0b5261203de03ca4c47d.jpeg

  • Enjoyed 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Splendid specimen with gorgeous detail! :thumbsu:

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

After the big freeze around Christmas, I brought my bucket of last year’s river finds in from outside. I checked each of them to look for anything that split and was happy to find a few decent things. 
 

In a nice bit of continuity with my last post, I had another excellent Acanthotelson stimpsoni crack open.

 

A3841407-574B-4D1D-B1CB-056DE8B8C28B.thumb.jpeg.d9ff1856bf0300a8ed4ad15fa6d427a0.jpeg

 

A0A952D1-DC94-4BA0-942F-C845E94397EC.thumb.jpeg.e6dc0b0f824ac076474188e08f2ccdd4.jpeg

 

4D590E71-11CC-4AFC-8BA3-3669FEA406C1.thumb.jpeg.5016d9429290d9ff31d278ecb2951ff6.jpeg

 

There were also some ferns as well. First, a very partial bit of Lobatopteris?

 

8D9AB106-0396-43A8-9206-0AA68165677F.thumb.jpeg.14a722ee8907c0e5bc4be645bc83e13f.jpeg

 

And then this mostly complete one, perhaps Cyathocarpus or Diplazites?

 

A1EE425D-3E3A-464D-B232-DFF7582C3A38.thumb.jpeg.bcc24d5688a833fb8176621fb8f93023.jpeg

 

The bucket is back outside again, hopefully the freeze coming in next week will do some more work!

  • Enjoyed 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good ones!  I've been getting common stuff and a very large Annularia from Danville.  I'll post it soon.

 

Cheers,

Rich

 

  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Nimravis said:

Nice finds Ben- I have not checked mine yet.

Thanks, Ralph!

 

13 minutes ago, stats said:

Good ones!  I've been getting common stuff and a very large Annularia from Danville.  I'll post it soon.

 

Cheers,

Rich

 

 

Thanks! I look forward to seeing those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...