Stilitano Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Greetings! I found this imprint on a large piece of what I assume is coal on the beach in SC. Sand was dredged from offshore to replenish the beach, and there are fossilized teeth of deer, mammoth, mastodon, tapir, megalodons, etc. Nothing nearly as old as a trilobite. A lot of heavy coal pieces were on the beach after hurricane Matthew and I found this imprint on one of them. Can anyone tell from this image if it's a nothing or a something? (Pics were tricky, but can take more if needed and if image file too big I can squish it down.) --Stilitano Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stilitano Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 Same pic, closer up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmaier Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I'm guessing it is a plant fossil, but can't pin it to anything in particular. I see other imprints that look like plant fossils right next to it, so... guilt by association. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stilitano Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 Thank you. I was hoping the surrounding imprints might give a clue. But definitely sad it's not a trilobite! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmaier Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's likely a fossil from the Pennsylvanian period, 300 million years old. Definately worth picking up, and not to be sad about! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stilitano Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 Wow. I think the oldest fossil I have so far is from the Miocene; so I would be very happy to have something from that period! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stilitano Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 On your advice, tmaier, looking at plants, perhaps calamite? Maybe someone else will chime in on my not trilobite. Thank you again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmaier Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It might be a Calamites. Those stalks had ribbing on the inside and on the outside. The inside cast is called a pith cast. But it also might be the internal cast of a Cordaites, called a Artisia. https://steurh.home.xs4all.nl/engcord/ecordai.html A weird thing about these fossil plants is that the parts are given different classification names, so the leaves have one name, the roots another classification name, the trunk a different name, etc. So it looks like one plant is actually five different species. It's a tradition to do that. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I think, there could be conchoidal fractures in the upper part of the matrix, which could suggest that is chertish or coalish. Could be just a geological feature resembling shrinkage/hackle fringe patterns in a conglomerate. (?), or maybe some mineral with iron contain resembling similar characters? " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmaier Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's a coal ball, and those are plant impressions. I've done a lot of picking in coal materials. At the top there does seem to be a precussion fracture, but the impressions are plant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stilitano Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 My plant knowledge is zero, so this is a valuable head start. Yes, there is a fracture, but the impressions are fairly detailed, distinct, and on one plane--the coal has layers you can see from the side. I'm not a mineral person, either, but in some places the imprints have a slight edge or rim around them that make them seem like. . .well, an impression. I do remember looking on the forum and being surprised by the deliberate and organic looking patterns minerals can make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now