Jump to content

1. Fossil ID please


Crann

Recommended Posts

Difficult to tell from the pictures.

My first impression was "lobster" / "Crab".

Cannot see any hint for vertebrate remains...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I darkened that first image a little for you so some parts are more visible.

 

jxbmfiag.jpg

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks flaky, ... like fish bone, to me. :headscratch:

  • I found this Informative 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

Looks flaky, ... like fish bone, to me. :headscratch:

 

I think you're right - I was going to suggest that but fish aren't my strong point... :)

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget - these are broken in half, showing cross sections. Not ideal for ID.  

It might be worth while to have them glued back together, and prepped out, from the outside. 

Just a thought. You might have better luck with ID with a full view, rather than a cross section. :unsure: 

Regards, 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would glue it together, and prep from the outside with a pen.

Another thought is to work on one half, going in from the side - so that you know where the fossil is. 

Might be a bit less daunting that way. 

 

I think, in the future, ... rather than trying to split them with a hammer, you might give the Freeze/Thaw method a shot. 

Search the Forum if you are unfamiliar with the process.

Best of luck, whatever you do. 

Regards, 

  • I found this Informative 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be sure. Make a lot of good detailed photos before you glue it. Just in case it goes badly you'll have some photos of how it looked before.

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think I like the sounds of going in to the side as not going in "blind" just need a decent pen to start the work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still in doubt about the fish:

no hint from the photos that it may be a fish (even in a cross section like this you should be able to see bones, scales, fins...).

And fishes are not so common in these layers as far as i know - Lobster's/Crab's are more common in some of the layers at the jurassic coast of Yorkshire..

On the other hand, the photos are not so good, especially concerning a needed close view on the details...so yes, there's room for discussion.

 

P.S.: A nice article (concerning of several parts) about Yorkshire coast you may find here: https://www.steinkern.de/fundorte/england-schottland-wales/262-yorkshire-2008-teil-1-scalby-ness.html

 

Best regards,

Pemphix

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pemphix said:

I'm still in doubt about the fish:

no hint from the photos that it may be a fish (even in a cross section like this you should be able to see bones, scales, fins...).

And fishes are not so common in these layers as far as i know - Lobster's/Crab's are more common in some of the layers at the jurassic coast of Yorkshire..

On the other hand, the photos are not so good, especially concerning a needed close view on the details...so yes, there's room for discussion.

 

P.S.: A nice article (concerning of several parts) about Yorkshire coast you may find here: https://www.steinkern.de/fundorte/england-schottland-wales/262-yorkshire-2008-teil-1-scalby-ness.html

 

Best regards,

Pemphix

 

 

I don't think it is a complete or partial fish, merely a bone of a fish. 

It has a flaky look to it that is typical of fish bones. 

I don't think anyone will be able to ID it correctly until it is prepped out of the nodule. 

I think it looks like a cross section through what may be a fish bone. ;) 

 

 

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good fish are rare here but it could be a piece of Gyrosteus (giant sturgeon), chunks of which are quite common in nodules from one or two beds.

  • I found this Informative 1

Tarquin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

 

it's a fish bone. I've got a similar nodule that I'll post later.

 

nice find. I'd just leave it as it is. If you glue it, you'll struggle to prep the bone.

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Welsh Wizard said:

Hi

 

it's a fish bone. I've got a similar nodule that I'll post later.

 

nice find. I'd just leave it as it is. If you glue it, you'll struggle to prep the bone.

 

Nick

Cheers Nick, appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picture 2: A set of what look like belly ribs. This is the same nodule but the other side. I split it twice.

 

apologies for the pictures reorientating themselves. Not sure what's happened.

 

IMG_0706.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...