Jump to content

Baby dinosaur?


Crazyhen

Recommended Posts

Would it be possible to tell what kind of dinosaur(?) is this?  As it’s quite small, would it be a baby dinosaur?

 

it is from Ganzhou, Jiangxi of China.

5BE38886-B16C-4432-9398-5D31551367CF.jpeg

FD4E7185-5FC0-47EF-B2EB-5A078A63CFE9.jpeg

5CCCF82F-E87B-49C2-B0E5-2DBB9305019D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it would be possible unless you got an x-ray of it, or it was prepped out totally.  :unsure: 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your photos continue to be inadequate to make any determination of what you have and there is no scale to determine size.  We need high resolution closeup pictures on your requests if you expect good answers.  A HD picture of the teeth might help get you an answer but it's just a blur when blown up.  Like Tim indicated prepping is a must but I doubt that will be done in the short term.  Just because it's small does not mean it's a baby there are lots small dinosaurs. 

 5CCCF82F-E87B-49C2-B0E5-2DBB9305019D.jpeg.a4a523295f3f3c355aeb491c95bfa336.jpg.3d95046a13b7df77afdad9af0469f6f5.jpg

  • I found this Informative 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First of let me say fantastic find by the brief glimpse we see through the matrix however as stated above from the small glimpse we have it is hard to determine what this is at this point in the prep work, however some indications of what helps to identify a baby or juvenile animal is the lack of fused skull remains this is something you should keep a look out for while prepping, and I wish you the best of luck.

 

When looking at what i assume is the skull the maxila and pre-maxila seem to look complete fused however that is only from the low non close up images shown here and that idea might very well change with additional images. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bet you got a small insectivorous or herbivorous dinosaur. An image of a specific dinosaur comes to mind but I forget the name...

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your interest and help with identifying this fossil.  The fossil belongs to a friend in China and I am requesting him to get me some higher resolution photos.  There are not much information on where it is found except that it’s said to be found in Ganzhou of Jiangxi Province.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It definitely looks like there's a type of reptile with a skull in there. As the others have said, prepping is likely needed to get good info. But a scale and better photos will also help.

 

In the last photo is looks like we're looking at the top of a skull. The supratemporal fenestra are visible on the back of the skull and one orbit for the eye is visible as well. There's a premaxilla that's floated away a little from the rest of the skull as well as a piece with small teeth in it. This might be the other premaxilla or maybe part of the dentary.

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With it being in Ganzhou I agree most likely from  Nanxiong Formation which is mostly in Guangdong Province but extends north into that City.  Unfortunately most of the Discoveries have been Oviraptoridae and six have been named from this fauna which is unreal.  Anyway this skull is not one and hopefully better images of  the teeth can tell what it is.   The skull also does not match the other two named Theropods.   It also might not be dinosaurian or something new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like it might have some resemblance to some primitive Ceratopsians, like Auroraceratops for example.

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, all, I have finally gotten some better photos of the fossil from my friend.  The fossil is small, measuring 16x20cm.  The teeth are tiny as shown in the photos.

IMG_9760.jpg

IMG_9759.jpg

IMG_9761.jpg

IMG_9762.jpg

IMG_9763.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although the photos are much better we really do not have HD closeups of the teeth to help but they appear broken anyway.  The only hope to obtain a general ID is with those images..   Could be a small Ornithischian like a Hypsilophodont 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's what I think I'm seeing. All of this is tentative though. With teeth on the premaxilla and such a large orbit I think Troodon might be on the right track with a Hypsolophodontid. If that's the case though, there should be also teeth on the maxilla, which aren't visible right now. I don't see it fitting with Sauropod.

So I think this desperately needs some careful prepping.

 

skull01.thumb.jpg.5e0a59a878100b37b392d425c43cb048.jpg

  • I found this Informative 4

Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The visible teeth fit Hypsilophodont so does the size and shape of the skull.   I put out sauropod as an alternative since I did not see the canine teeth.  The skull does work,  they are not large dinos.

If it's one definitely a new species to that fauna 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2018 at 7:43 AM, Troodon said:

Hypsilophodont

That’s the Dino I was thinking of! Don’t know much about it other then it’s general head and tooth shape.

“...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin

Happy hunting,

Mason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am also seeing the same structures as Lord T.  Small hyps is a good guess.  I am also thinking this needs some professional prep.   It looks like small, delicate bones and teeth in pretty hard rock... a challenge to say the least.  This thing definitely needs to be prepped under a binocular microscope.  The tool marks show a big tool; it demands smaller tools.   In one of the last photos, there are tool marks going right through many broken bones... again, needs more delicate prep work.  This is a potentially really cool specimen and would be a great subject for a donation to a local paleo museum.  (Or sell it to one of the rich guys running private museums in China).  This may not be what your friend wants to hear, but that is my opinion.    

  • I found this Informative 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the advice and comments.  It is indeed an interesting find.  But sadly, as usual, this fossil was partly damaged by the crude and rude way of recovering.  Those tool marks were not from prepping tools, they were left by digging tools of construction workers when the fossil was dug up and which has resulted unfortunately in the damages we have seen.  This unfortunately happens quite often as you might have also noticed from the similar marks shown in the dinosaur eggs I posted earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has any Hypsilophodont been discovered in China? And even Hypsilophodont is a small dinosaur, does this one look like a juvenile since it’s pretty small?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...