Jump to content

Rockwood

Recommended Posts

I found these while doing some prep. on fish in a Brazilian concretion.

They have to be seed shrimp. Right ?:fingerscrossed:

IMG_4530.JPG

IMG_4531.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They look like they might be. 

Some papers here

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you see two valves with one overlapping the other? If not they might be little phosphate pellets.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

They look like they might be. 

Some papers here

I noticed that one on appendages.

Frankly I was a little intimidated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Al Dente said:

Can you see two valves with one overlapping the other? If not they might be little phosphate pellets.

They seem to, especially on the shinier one. It's like a single waved line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The one on the top, in the middle, looks like it might have both valves.

 

 

    IMG_4530.JPG.45680d3b8743e14468c06e5e3083029f.JPG

 

IMG_4531.JPG.8bc861168085cc05ea729bc7aa4098f4.JPG

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JohnBrewer said:

Hmmm not sure. Maybe a little prep may help :ighappy:

The only way I can even pick them up is to stick them on a moistened finger. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

The one on the top, in the middle, looks like it might have both valves.

It's the only one I actually extracted. The others are likely steinkerns. I found them in the chips.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Plax said:

otoliths?

I have no personal experience with these, but I was under the impression that they are layered to a greater degree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, those are sesame seeds! you must have been eating a Big Mac while prepping. :ighappy:;)

-Dave

__________________________________________________

Geologists on the whole are inconsistent drivers. When a roadcut presents itself, they tend to lurch and weave. To them, the roadcut is a portal, a fragment of a regional story, a proscenium arch that leads their imaginations into the earth and through the surrounding terrain. - John McPhee

If I'm going to drive safely, I can't do geology. - John McPhee

Check out my Blog for more fossils I've found: http://viewsofthemahantango.blogspot.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without a really good closeup, they look very much like ostracods to me. Any idea what formation or period these came from? I find a lot of ostracods in Carboniferous Period matrix. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be .

Possibly cytherellids.

"Brazilian concretion" might imply Pattersoncypris

I'm more used to seeing SEMs of ostracods,so I'm possibly not the best one to judge

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gturner333 said:

Any idea what formation or period these came from?

 

5 hours ago, doushantuo said:

Might be .

Possibly cytherellids.

"Brazilian concretion" might imply Pattersoncypris

I'm more used to seeing SEMs of ostracods,so I'm possibly not the best one to judge

Cretaceous Santana formation I believe.

A binocular scope may be one of the things I have to pack with me when I retire to a warmer more fossiliferous climate, but SEM not so likely. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Plax said:

otoliths?

Not otoliths. Too round (Spherical).

 

Coco

  • I found this Informative 1

----------------------
OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici

Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici
Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici
Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici
Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici
Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici
Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici

Un Greg...

Badges-IPFOTH.jpg.f4a8635cda47a3cc506743a8aabce700.jpg Badges-MOTM.jpg.461001e1a9db5dc29ca1c07a041a1a86.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...