A very small (but slowly growing) part of my collection is comprised of some gift and some purchased fossils.
I've never paid more than $35.00 for a fossil. 
(Not including shipping)
Yep. I'm a cheapskate. 
- Album created by Fossildude19
- Updated
- 63 images
- 5 album comments
- 152 image comments
- 1,927 views
-
1
-
5
.jpg.9840b64620a6c30a594cbcd19aa7a547.jpg)
-
Gallery Statistics
52.6k
Images16k
Comments3k
Albums -
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Image Comments
-
By trilobites_are_awesome · Posted
@Thomas1982
A Devonian brittle star is definitely on my wish list!
-
By Mikrogeophagus · Posted
@Jared C I agree that the other Cretodus is pretty different. It actually took me a long time to settle on the genus because it stands out from most of my other Kau/Kef Cretodus specimens especially in terms of root morphology. It seems reminiscent of C. semiplicatus from the Cenomanian, but also shares many characteristics with the co-occurring teeth, so it's hard to make sense of it all. I think at the end of the day, this tooth is from the upper jaw and the previous tooth is from the lower of the same species.
There were definitely two species as the very least, given that C. crassidens and C. houghtonorum lived together!
Beyond those species, Cretodus, I think, could be the taxonomically messiest large Cretaceous shark genus in TX. Shimada did some good work separating them into 3 grades, but I have some hesitancy on the validity of those categorizations...
All I can say for sure is that all of these Cretodus teeth have the strongest affinities with C. houghtonorum, but I doubt they are the same species!
-
By Jared C · Posted
compared to the Cretodus that came before this in your album, I see a lot of differences. I wonder if the the early Coniacian has two species...
-
-
By boesch · Posted
Bonjour , c'est la première fois que je vois des fossiles d'Irlande , et vos préparations sont remarquables , très belles et permettent un retour dans
le temps impressionnant , Merci
-
_edited.jpg.d39f6ea4e018db13a45fe386a2416edf.jpg)
By JamieLynn · Posted
@Mikrogeophagus - these were finds from last year! Just finally getting them uploaded to the albums.....I am hoping to go back in January...that seems the best time to find em
-
-
By rocket · Posted
Sorry for a little confusion. The fish is NOT Palaeoniscum, it is Paramblypterus... Better to do not too many things at the same time..., photographed and archieved lot of Permian Material from Harz (Kupferschiefer with Palaeoniscum) and Permian Material from Pfalz Region (with Paramblypterus)... So, due to this and because I've always been a bit absent-minded , things got mixed up...
-
By ThePhysicist · Posted
Interesting, it does look like it could be the same morphology. Too bad the enamel's gone.
-
-
_edited.jpg.d39f6ea4e018db13a45fe386a2416edf.jpg)
