Jump to content
© &copyHarry Pristis

Using Scientific Names


Harry Pristis

I don't see this discussed among collectors, and there may be some confusion about using binomial nomenclature ("scientific names") when identifying fossils.

There are rules for naming fossils and for using those names in formal writing. These rules are promulgated by the International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) for several purposes:

The first purpose is to promote the universality of scientific names of animals so that everyone uses the same name for the same taxon.

The second purpose is to insure that each name is unique and distinct.

The third purpose is to insure the use of priority when choosing between possible names, generally the earliest name is preferred.

Hobbyists/collectors are most concerned with the lower levels of the hierarchy of formal names -- family, genus, and species. Here are some rules which apply at those levels:

A formal name above the species level, including the genus, is a single word which is always capitalized when it is used in a formal sense. e.g. "Otodontidae" or "Reptilia."

The formal scientific name of an animal always consists of at least two words. The first is the generic name, the second is the trivial name. Sometimes, when the trivial name is not determined, the scientific name may be expressed as in Carcharhinus sp. without italicizing the "sp." (for species).

The generic and trivial names are always underlined or italicized when used in a formal sense. The genus name is always capitalized, while the species name is never capitalized. e.g. Canis dirus.

The use of the trivial name "megalodon" by itself is not formal, but rather is an example of a trivial name entering the vernacular. The name megalodon has become a common name, and as such, is neither capitalized nor italicized.

Here is a sketch of how these terms appear in a formal setting.

Copyright

© &copyHarry Pristis

From the album:

LINE-DRAWINGS & ARTIFACTS

· 30 images
  • 30 images
  • 0 comments
  • 21 image comments


Recommended Comments

Uncle Siphuncle

Posted

Harry,

Plaudits for raising the bar in this area. I've noticed that even in some of the premier clubs in my state many collectors have not gotten this scholarly about ICZN rules. To take things a but further, would you be so kind as to define c.f., spp., and some of the other oddball notations for the record, showing how to correctly read and apply them? Thanks.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...