Jump to content

woodnah

Recommended Posts

  • New Members

Hi everyone.

Of all stones I have found, this one puzzles me the most and I don’t know what to think about it. It would be nice to hear from you, even if it would just mean excluding the possibility that it is a fossil. I'm sharing the photos and all the information that might be useful.

 

The place: Mount Medvednica has risen some 10 million years ago, at an area of ex Pannonian sea. The mountain is made of palaeozoic and Mesozoic rocks. There are deposits of limestone and dolomite and various karst phenomena — there is cave explored 6km in depth 5km far, where the Neandertal man was found. There are many finds of shells and fish on the Medvednica (over 3000), and a couple of km further a whole whale skeleton about 13 million years old and 6m long was found (cub, the only specimen found of its kind).

I found the rock on the forest floor while mushroom hunting, on a steep side beside a mountain stream, but not in it, on an altitude around 400m. The roots might have brought it up as there were many fallen trees around.

 

The surface is dotted with intersecting lines, some more than 10cm and some only 2mm long. The general shape is triangular, it is flat (6,5-7cm thick) and has indentations on two on two opposite sides. The lines concentrate (more and more tiny dashes closer to the indentation). There is a tiny indentation on the “front” side as well. There are both “engraved” and bulging lines, so the texture is a relief.

I have more photos, but this fits into the limit. I can add them if there's any need.

 

I’ll appreciate your comments!

 

01.jpg

01b.jpg

01f.jpg

01e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • New Members

Thank you all, I'm learning. It looks fantastic and dramatic, the mesh of microfractures, and your explanation sounds perfectly logical. I didn't know about any of this. Thanks! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too much directional change over a short distance to be glacial striations, IMHO. If the rock was meters in diameter, then possibly. Glaciers don't tend to make abrupt turns.

However, I would have collected it as a fine specimen of whatever it is.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/15/2020 at 3:17 PM, Mark Kmiecik said:

Too much directional change over a short distance to be glacial striations, IMHO. If the rock was meters in diameter, then possibly. Glaciers don't tend to make abrupt turns.

However, I would have collected it as a fine specimen of whatever it is.

I would think that is correct about glacial movement but I was imagining the rock turning as it was pushed along. Do think these long, straight lines are the result of fracturing instead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BobWill said:

I would think that is correct about glacial movement but I was imagining the rock turning as it was pushed along. Do think these long, straight lines are the result of fracturing instead?

Possibly. Or mineral veins? If you follow the length of one of the "striations" it changes direction 180 degrees too frequently. I don't see enough "parallel" lines to convince me.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Oooh! I want it to be an artifact, bit would have to agree that these are naturally produced.  I have found similar striations in the Wheeler Shale of Utah.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...