RJB Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 I dont mean to sound so ignorant but ive been watching some dino type shows on TV and I realized a question. On one of the shows a guy was pointing out the KT boundry. Then he goes on to say that below this boundry dinosaurs can be found and that above this bondry no dinosaurs can be found. On another show they were talking about how birds are decendants of the dinosaurs. So, my question is, How can birds have evovled from something that went extinct 65 million years ago? I know there must be a simple answer,,,,, but what the heck is it? RB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Dente Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 Brief answer- birds evolved from dinosaurs in the Jurassic, long before the end Cretaceous event that killed the non-avian dinosaurs. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggycardon Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 Well I think the most simple answer to that is because birds evolved before the KT extinction. It's actually false documentaries say that all dinosaurs went extinct after the KT extinction, all non-avian dinosaurs did. But the avian dinosaurs which we now call birds did survive. This bird for instance, which was discribed a few months ago, is the oldest known modern birds species, which lived a few 100 000 years before the KT-extinction. 3 Interested in all things paleontology, geology, zoology, evolution, natural history and science! Professional exotic pet keeper, huge fantasy geek, explorer of the microfossil realm, member of the BVP (Belgian Association for Paleontology), Volunteer prepper at Oertijdmuseum Boxtel. View my collection topic here: The Growing Collection of Ziggycardon My animal collection at the "Members pet" topic Ziggycardon's exploration of the microfossil realm Trips to Eben Emael (Maastrichtian of Belgium) My latest fossil hunt Next project will be a dedicated prepping space. "A mind needs books as a sword needs a whetstone, if it is to keep its edge." - Tyrion Lannister Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Rico Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 Good question Ron , I thought the birds had evolve long time before the mass exhibition. I believe most of the tree dwelling bird died out because of the forests been destroyed by lack of light and acid rain. The ground living birds like say chickens survived in the same ways as the early rodents did and they evolved into modern day birds. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggycardon Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 You might find these videos worth watching as well 5 Interested in all things paleontology, geology, zoology, evolution, natural history and science! Professional exotic pet keeper, huge fantasy geek, explorer of the microfossil realm, member of the BVP (Belgian Association for Paleontology), Volunteer prepper at Oertijdmuseum Boxtel. View my collection topic here: The Growing Collection of Ziggycardon My animal collection at the "Members pet" topic Ziggycardon's exploration of the microfossil realm Trips to Eben Emael (Maastrichtian of Belgium) My latest fossil hunt Next project will be a dedicated prepping space. "A mind needs books as a sword needs a whetstone, if it is to keep its edge." - Tyrion Lannister Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuMert Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 If you are referring to thebrainscoop youtube channel with a recent video actually featuring a guy pointing to the K-Pg boundary in an outcrop, they did remark the birds survived the event:) 1 My sites & reports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 11 hours ago, Bobby Rico said: Good question Ron , I thought the birds had evolve long time before the mass exhibition. I believe most of the tree dwelling bird died out because of the forests been destroyed by lack of light and acid rain. The ground living birds like say chickens survived in the same ways as the early rodents did and they evolved into modern day birds. Hi Bobby, There were no rodents in the Cretaceous. There were small mammals that would have looked like them but the earliest rodents didn't evolve until the late Paleocene. I have seen Early Eocene rodent fossils and they appear to be rather uncommon relative to other mammal groups at the time. They were still the new kids. Jess 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Rico Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 On 29/06/2020 at 12:41 AM, siteseer said: no rodents in the Cretaceous Sorry mammals is what meant to say thanks Bobby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted June 29, 2020 Author Share Posted June 29, 2020 Thanks everyone. I knew it had to be something simple and it figures that TV does not explain it fully enough for people with little brains like me. RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Rico Posted June 29, 2020 Share Posted June 29, 2020 Just now, RJB said: Thanks everyone. I knew it had to be something simple and it figures that TV does not explain it fully enough I think your question made for an interesting thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted June 29, 2020 Author Share Posted June 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Bobby Rico said: I think your question made for an interesting thread And it came with lots of other pertinent information too. RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ptychodus04 Posted June 29, 2020 Share Posted June 29, 2020 Oddly enough, up until the end of the Cretaceous, Enantiornithes was by far the most successful bird clade with Euornithes (and later Aves) being much less successful until the rest of their saurian family bought the farm. 4 Regards, Kris Global Paleo Services, LLC https://globalpaleoservices.com http://instagram.com/globalpaleoservices http://instagram.com/kris.howe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuMert Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Yes, this is strange and corresponds more to the older theories of extinction (dinosaurs couldn't adapt and such) My sites & reports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ptychodus04 Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 5 hours ago, RuMert said: Yes, this is strange and corresponds more to the older theories of extinction (dinosaurs couldn't adapt and such) Enantiornithines are functionally the same as modern birds. The only real difference is in a swapping of ball for socket in the shoulders and ankle (if I remember correctly). This would imply that adaptation had nothing to do with extinction. Regards, Kris Global Paleo Services, LLC https://globalpaleoservices.com http://instagram.com/globalpaleoservices http://instagram.com/kris.howe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuMert Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Well, they at least had teeth, clawed wings and pretty different tail, so not so close to modern birds. But unlike big animals and marine fauna their extiction cannot be easily explained with impact events, lack of oxygen and plankton disappearance My sites & reports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 some of you may like The Completeness of the Fossil Record of Mesozoic Birds:Implications for Early Avian Evolution Neil Brocklehurst,*, Paul Upchurch,, Philip D. Mannion, Jingmai O’Connor (about 4,5Mb) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doushantuo Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 some of youmaylike about 8MB An unusual bird (Theropoda, Avialae) from the Early Cretaceous of Japan suggests complex evolutionary history of basal birds Takuya Ima, Yoichi Azuma, Soichiro Kawabe, Masateru Shibata, Kazunori Miyata, COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY | (2019) 2:399 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0639-4 | www.nature.com/commsbio 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 My two cents on RJB's original question: In 1997 Luis Chiappe's came out with a paper in which he did a cladistic study of birds and dinosaurs and claimed that bird are indeed actual dinosaurs. This means that dinosaurs did NOT go extinct. This was fairly well accepted by dinosaur paleontologists but before long they realized that they could no longer say that dinosaurs went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous. Instead they had to start using the term "non-avian dinosaurs" when talking about what we classically know as dinosaurs. 23 years later it is still common to just say that dinosaurs went extinct at the end of the Cretaceous rather than using the much longer and more confusing term 'non-avian dinosaurs'. I know, I do it all the time. It is easier and much more understandable to say something like 'dinosaurs went extinct here.. except birds', which RuMert mentions the guy did say in the show. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thecosmilia Trichitoma Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 On 6/28/2020 at 4:46 AM, RJB said: I dont mean to sound so ignorant but ive been watching some dino type shows on TV and I realized a question. On one of the shows a guy was pointing out the KT boundry. Then he goes on to say that below this boundry dinosaurs can be found and that above this bondry no dinosaurs can be found. On another show they were talking about how birds are decendants of the dinosaurs. So, my question is, How can birds have evovled from something that went extinct 65 million years ago? I know there must be a simple answer,,,,, but what the heck is it? RB For more information about dinosaurs, I recommend the book, "The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs" by Steve Brusatte. It's easy to understand, but contains many more details than most TV series. It also has a great list of sources at the end, which go into the topics in more detail. 1 It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt -Mark Twain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuMert Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Dinosaur exctinction concept was based on the older idea of "primitive monstruous creatures" that inhabited Earth in antediluvian period akin to H.P.Lovecraft's creations (which itself was good compared to permanent animal types concept). Those terrifying alien beings won the heart of children and enthousiastic researchers woldwide, largely because they were so weird and otherworldly. But then came more facts and the understanding that dinosaurs were not that horrible, but normal animals, even feathered, vividly colored and overall birdish-looking (not all for sure) while birds themselves turned out part of the dinosaur lineage. Most people accepted this fact intellectually but emotionally did not yet come to terms with birds being dinosaurs. Cool extinct prehistoric monsters concept is still appealing. 4 My sites & reports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted July 1, 2020 Share Posted July 1, 2020 quoting RuMert above: "Most people accepted this fact intellectually but emotionally did not yet come to terms with birds being dinosaurs" Bingo!! I, as a bird watcher all my life, will rarely say, I wonder what kind of dinosaur that was that just flew by, even though I know it is one. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts