New Members raegage1 Posted January 4, 2010 New Members Share Posted January 4, 2010 i have had this for about 20 years and need help id like to findout what it was fromand the age range for it or send mein the right direction on where i could go to have itlooked at thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCFossils Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 Looks like a partial megalodon tooth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edd Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 (edited) i say partial megalodon shark tooth Edited January 4, 2010 by edd " We're all puppets, I'm just a puppet who can see the strings. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenixflood Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 yes, I would say it it one too. I believe they were around the miocene, 23 mya. Is the miocene the first apperance of the Megalodon or was it a few million years ealier? The soul of a Fossil Hunter is one that is seeking, always. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members raegage1 Posted January 4, 2010 Author New Members Share Posted January 4, 2010 what do you mean partial its a whole tooth just the front has been wornaway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholas Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The root is missing, and the front being worn away also suggests that it is a partial tooth. It is however definitely a Meg, and a good find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seldom Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 The root is pretty much gone that's way it's call a partial Nice tooth ether way Galveston Island 32 miles long 2 miles wide 134 bars 23 liquor stores any questions? Evolution is Chimp Change. Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass; it's about learning to dance in the rain! "I like to listen. I have learned a great deal from listening carefully. Most people never listen." Ernest Hemingway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RCFossils Posted January 4, 2010 Share Posted January 4, 2010 It is missing most of the root and quite a bit of the surface enamel. That is why i would catagorize it as a partial tooth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now