Mochaccino Posted March 10, 2022 Share Posted March 10, 2022 (edited) Hello all, Thank you always for your help. This time I'm asking about a Bundenbach crinoid I came across. The seller says it's a Thallocrinus sp. but an unusual one and that "Bundenbach crinoid experts" are divided on further identification. More importantly, I have very little experience looking at these sort of crinoids and honestly this almost looks spray-painted gold to me (even though I know these are pyritized) so I wanted to consult TFF experts on it regarding its authenticity. The first 2 photos taken under flash photography, the rest in natural sunlight: If it is genuine, what do you think of the species ID? The following photo is the only other Bundenbach Thallocrinus I could find, a Thallocrinus procerus, but it has much clearer pinnules than the specimen in question. I cannot tell if this is due to difference in species, incomplete prep, or worst of all bad preservation, though the seller claims poor preservation is not the case here. Thank you. Edited March 10, 2022 by Mochaccino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 This looks real to me. Not sure of any ID for it, however. @oilshale Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilDAWG Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 Looks real to me as well, and I was also going to tag @oilshale. The difference in appearance from the specimen in the last photo may in part be because it has been fully prepped by air abrasion to uncover all the pinnules, and your specimen has not been prepped fully. Don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oilshale Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 (edited) Hard to say, that would require an x-ray and I am not a specialist for Bundenbach crinoids. As far as I can see this could also be a Hapalocrinus (both are relatively common). Thallocrinus and Hapalocrinus both have no (or at most a small) anal sac; the single-lined arms bifurcate over the second brachial. This seems to be the case here. Hapalocrinus differs from Thallocrinus in the presence of tiny three-pointed articulating spines which are inserted on the oral side of the arms (I can't tell, the picture is too blurry for that). Four species are known of Thallocrinus and five species (or varieties) of Hapalocrinus, differing in the number and length of the arms and pinnules, the shape of the stem elements, and their robustness. Edited March 11, 2022 by oilshale 4 Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes (Confucius, 551 BC - 479 BC). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnJ Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 18 hours ago, Mochaccino said: this almost looks spray-painted gold to me This same effect can be achieved using a brass wire brush by hand or motor driven rotary wheel. It would take a very close in hand examination to determine if this technique was used. Tiny wire 'scars' and color missing in pitted areas would be clues. 1 1 The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true. - JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mochaccino Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 6 hours ago, Fossildude19 said: This looks real to me. Not sure of any ID for it, however. @oilshale 4 hours ago, FossilDAWG said: Looks real to me as well, and I was also going to tag @oilshale. The difference in appearance from the specimen in the last photo may in part be because it has been fully prepped by air abrasion to uncover all the pinnules, and your specimen has not been prepped fully. Don Thank you! Yes I was wondering if the prep was simply incomplete as I could see some pinnules almost buried in the shale. That would definitely be preferable to outright poor preservation. 3 hours ago, oilshale said: Hard to say, that would require an x-ray and I am not a specialist for Bundenbach crinoids. As far as I can see this could also be a Hapalocrinus (both are relatively common). Thallocrinus and Hapalocrinus both have no (or at most a small) anal sac; the single-lined arms bifurcate over the second brachial. This seems to be the case here. Hapalocrinus differs from Thallocrinus in the presence of tiny three-pointed articulating spines which are inserted on the oral side of the arms (I can't tell, the picture is too blurry for that). Four species are known of Thallocrinus and five species (or varieties) of Hapalocrinus, differing in the number and length of the arms and pinnules, the shape of the stem elements, and their robustness. Very informative and good to know. I tried looking into some descriptions of these but literature on them seems surprisingly scare or inaccessible. X-ray also isn't exactly the easiest thing to get a hold of...so potential for either Thallocrinus or Hapalocrinus on this one. 2 hours ago, JohnJ said: This same effect can be achieved using a brass wire brush by hand or motor driven rotary wheel. It would take a very close in hand examination to determine if this technique was used. Tiny wire 'scars' and color missing in pitted areas would be clues. Are you saying those clues would indicate spray-painting as opposed to true pyritization, which would be uncovered by said techniques? Thank you all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnJ Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 36 minutes ago, Mochaccino said: Are you saying those clues would indicate spray-painting as opposed to true pyritization, which would be uncovered by said techniques? Not spray paint; rather the brass brush is soft enough to leave a thin coating of brass that imitates pyritization. 2 The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true. - JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mochaccino Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 24 minutes ago, JohnJ said: Not spray paint; rather the brass brush is soft enough to leave a thin coating of brass that imitates pyritization. I was not aware of that, thanks for letting me know! It is something I can ask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oilshale Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 The fossils in Bundenbach are (almost) always pyritized - only mostly not in the form of shiny pyrite crystals but as a gray-black mass. In former times brass brushes were used to prepare the fossils. Fine details have been lost by this method, but the brass residue has given the fossils a nice shiny golden surface. Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes (Confucius, 551 BC - 479 BC). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mochaccino Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 6 minutes ago, oilshale said: The fossils in Bundenbach are (almost) always pyritized - only mostly not in the form of shiny pyrite crystals but as a gray-black mass. In former times brass brushes were used to prepare the fossils. Fine details have been lost by this method, but the brass residue has given the fossils a nice shiny golden surface. I see, so is the golden color here indicative of that method of prep rather than by air-abrasive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 42 minutes ago, Mochaccino said: I see, so is the golden color here indicative of that method of prep rather than by air-abrasive? I think it is a possibility. However, it is hard to be sure without in hand analysis. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mochaccino Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 27 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said: I think it is a possibility. However, it is hard to be sure without in hand analysis. I see...it seems like the brass itself can be washed off but what I really fear is the loss of fine detail with such a method. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now