Tony Eaton Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 (edited) I was a bit disappointed on a hunt a month ago out in East Texas. No big crock teeth or perfect larger shark teeth as I might have hoped. However, in the end after sorting through the smaller gravel I brought back home I am pretty happy afterall. I'll start with the really small stuff, a small oral tooth from a sawfish and a nice foraminifera. Here are a bit bigger teeth. I.E., Sclerorhynchus, Serratolamna serrata , Archaeolamna kopingensis, Carcharias sp., Some more smaller teeth, Squantina sp., Enchodus, Archeolamna, Rhinobatos sp., younger mammal teeth, etc. Some bigger teeth, Carcharias sp., Squalicorax pristodontus, Enchodus, some grastopod internal molds, some tubular fossils whose name escapes me. Here is some big stuff, palm wood I believe and some baculites chunks with cool suture patterns. I also found what is possibly a lissodus tooth? If so, pretty cool to find a hybodont tooth in the Maastrichtian. Edited April 22, 2010 by Tony Eaton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glacialerratic Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 That's some pretty cool finds! Did you use a scope to find those little beauties? Thanks for sharing, Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted April 22, 2010 Share Posted April 22, 2010 Definitely, a nice haul! Nice pictures of some very small stuff! Thanks for sharing with us. Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Eaton Posted April 22, 2010 Author Share Posted April 22, 2010 Thanks for taking a look. Regarding using a scope, only for the smallest sub 2mm stuff. Even then just a magnifying glass worked well. This material was easy to sort through because most everything not good are dull colored chunks of clay. This is good because there were not that many teeth, the above represents about 3 gallons total and that is after the original material was reduced chemically. The exception are the foraminifera, which are very common. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now