Jump to content

Echinocorys from Les Andelys, France


Mart1980

Recommended Posts

Today I receive some Echinocorys

(Leske, 1778) sea urchins. Some still in their flint matrix. I am in love with their color variety. They were found in the fields around Les Andelys along the River Seine. Parasitic worm tunnels are visible on some sea urchins. Also contain some mini calcite crystals, which are clearly visible in the sunlight.

 

For my sea urchin collection and welcome addition. I would like to identify them by species, who can help me with good online documentation about these sea urchins?

 

I will also post detailed pictures in the topic so I can get some help. This will follow when I have better light and time. I like to hear when people recognize species :Wink1:

 

Screenshot_20221022-121324_Marktplaats.jpg

 

Screenshot_20221022-121329_Marktplaats.jpg

 

image-20-10-2022_10-15-19-33.jpg

 

image-20-10-2022_10-13-54-21.jpg

 

Screenshot_20221022-121428_Marktplaats.jpg

 

Screenshot_20221022-121457_Marktplaats.jpg

 

Screenshot_20221025-183825_Marktplaats.jpg

 

Screenshot_20221025-183830_Marktplaats.jpg

 

Screenshot_20221025-183859_Marktplaats.jpg

Edited by Mart1980
  • Enjoyed 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mart1980 changed the title to Echinocorys from Les Andelys, France

Moved.  No problem.  :fistbump:

  • Thank You 1

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Identifying an echinoid with only an internal mold is difficult because the characters of the species are found on the shell.

Generally, these Echinocorys are assigned to the species scutata

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know there is a conclusion (Hayward 1941) that only one (variable) species can be distinguished, namely Echinocorys scutata. Thereby they distinguish one into five 'formae', I hope to be able to bring mine to a 'formae' name. Yes they are molds, but still with a lot of details and some are clear enough in shape to perhaps assign to a 'formae'. The pointed ones in particular go well with 'perconica'.

 

As a species I therefore leave them on Echinocorys scutata. There will certainly be more information in the future, the science surrounding Echinocorys is far from being resolved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shape is not a determining criterion in sea urchins. Within the same species, we can find tall, round, flatter, more or less conical shapes. An internal mold does not allow to see the arrangement of the plates, the fascioles, the pores, so many characteristics useful for the determination. Yes, the scutata species is a catchall but with your specimens, we cannot go further

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The opinion I now follow is that all these sea urchins are Echinocorys scutata. I only look at which forms exist within this species. Surely five forms would have been studied there.

 

I agree that the shape of a sea urchin 'alone' means nothing. But together with a sum of still visible characteristics one can come a long way with flint sea urchins. In addition, a lot of the characteristics are visible in many of these sea urchins. Although it is difficult to see in a photo, there are two examples.

 

20221027_120510.jpg

 

20221027_115227.jpg

 

But maybe my search will lead to nothing in the end. Then at least the color diversity brings life to my sea urchin display, with mostly white marl sea urchins.

Edited by Mart1980
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...