Jump to content

Is this a coprolite?


Vopros

Recommended Posts

I bought this rock online auction site.

it was sold as a Permian Coprolite with bones from Oklahoma.

it is 2 cm long.

The last 5 images are microscopic.

what do you think?

 

AD5A9879-FD74-403A-BB92-7ED1405CE800.jpeg

0723E7F6-50B7-4C6A-8612-63D3913602C3.jpeg

A6C20035-5925-4FB9-906F-C269F9514475.jpeg

3F56FF3C-17BC-4283-B83B-A5C110C4B2DB.jpeg

B013B003-8DC8-40AB-BF38-724224538EAD.jpeg

3F94030C-C1EE-4B0E-867A-B4BC3895B9D2.jpeg

0EEA0538-E30C-4A8A-B0B5-78ECA700EC39.jpeg

B3449447-BF78-4F77-9C40-A5EAA5556FBE.jpeg

Edited by Vopros
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a coprolite to me. @Carl  @GeschWhat

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2023 at 8:03 AM, Fossildude19 said:

Looks like a coprolite to me. @Carl  @GeschWhat

Thank you, Tim!

I wonder what is this thing? It looks as skin, is it not?

889A0A59-EA22-487D-92EE-DCE61CF85F4E.png

Edited by Vopros
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks more like bone or cartilage.

  • I found this Informative 2
  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said:

Looks more like bone or cartilage.

Thank you, Tim!

could you, please, tell me if all animals have cartilage,

and how one could tell apart fossil skin and fossil cartilage.

IMO they look kind-of similar

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the thing in question is marked with the red arrow. What are the things marked with the blue arrows? Are they bones?

A98E64E2-9A6C-4589-AB31-920E57765148.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but I have very little knowledge of fossilized skin.

But there were xenacanthid sharks where this was found, which to me, would indicate cartilage over skin.

Like I said, it could also be bone, like some kind of ornamented fish bone.  :shrug:

  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fossildude19 said:

I'm sorry, but I have very little knowledge of fossilized skin.

But there were xenacanthid sharks where this was found, which to me, would indicate cartilage over skin.

Like I said, it could also be bone, like some kind of ornamented fish bone.  :shrug:

Here is a closeup. In the upper portion of the image there are thin lines in between the features. Maybe this will help you to ID what it is?

 

7E1044AC-CDDE-4F66-B929-DE4449CE3E91.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/28/2023 at 11:03 AM, Fossildude19 said:

Looks like a coprolite to me. @Carl  @GeschWhat

Sure looks legit to me. And I completely agree with chondrichthyan cartilage. Lots of that come from these beds and the taphonomy is not the type from which one would expect fossil skin.

  • Enjoyed 1
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for chiming in, @Carl !

 

BTW, @Vopros,   Carl is the go to guy for coprolites.

  • Enjoyed 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Carl said:

Sure looks legit to me. And I completely agree with chondrichthyan cartilage. Lots of that come from these beds and the taphonomy is not the type from which one would expect fossil skin.

Thank you, Carl! I wonder if this “chondrichthyan cartilage” could be actually coral? See the separation lanes? 

 

E5CA3500-A6B0-435F-B388-AC46A328F88E.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't expect to find coral in a coprolite, but I would expect to find shark cartilage. 

Cartilage does look like this with the separation lines.

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 1

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Vopros said:

Thank you, Carl! I wonder if this “chondrichthyan cartilage” could be actually coral? See the separation lanes? 

 

E5CA3500-A6B0-435F-B388-AC46A328F88E.jpeg

 

This is 100% cartilage, which is most likely shark cartilage from a xenacanthid.  So this is a coprolite from a predator that ate a shark (among other things), but this doesnt look like a shark coprolite, even though they were known to be cannibalistic.   That greatly narrows the range of critters it could be from.

Edited by hadrosauridae
additional info
  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 1

"There is no shortage of fossils. There is only a shortage of paleontologists to study them." - Larry Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, hadrosauridae said:

 

This is 100% cartilage, which is most likely shark cartilage from a xenacanthid.  So this is a coprolite from a predator that ate a shark (among other things), but this doesnt look like a shark coprolite, even though they were known to be cannibalistic.   That greatly narrows the range of critters it could be from.


Thank you! If this is shark’s cartilage, then is there a shark’s tooth on the attached image?

One more question.. This Coprolite is very small (2 cm. In length).
Is not this too small for an animal that fed on a shark?

BTW at least in the modern time I did see some animals feeding on sharks.

For example, here is a sea lion consuming a leopard shark.

As you see there are seagulls trying to catch a piece.
So I wonder, if his is possible that a bigger animal actually killed a shark

and a smaller one (the one that left a Coprolite) was just feeding on the pieces?

Also, this Coprolite is from Oklahoma. Were there sharks in Oklahoma?

Thank you!

46CCE5DC-C79C-4D34-A429-F761201A5ECB.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your pic doesnt look like a xenacanthid tooth (and yes, they were a very common freshwater shark in Oklahoma).  Xenacanthid teeth are tri-cuspid.    

 

This is a permian shark tooth

 

341214239_695798432555496_7552836775240681529_n.thumb.jpg.63a1c5f8332e1e43c05f80280d43ec68.jpg

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 1

"There is no shortage of fossils. There is only a shortage of paleontologists to study them." - Larry Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Thank you!

If it is not a tooth, then what it is? It does not look as a bone either IMO.

And there are more inclusions similar to this one. Some of them appear to have rims.
 

1E787DA5-BEF6-41A2-9C04-90DB01AF6050.jpeg

9E03F7E4-4ACF-44FE-BC16-5C8DC016F1BB.jpeg

6BBD461A-246F-4AED-A822-DD6C049F75AF.jpeg

Edited by Vopros
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Vopros said:

Thank you, Carl! I wonder if this “chondrichthyan cartilage” could be actually coral? See the separation lanes? 

 

E5CA3500-A6B0-435F-B388-AC46A328F88E.jpeg

Still only seeing cartilage. Plus, those deposits are all fresh water. And finally, I've never heard of any invertebrate fossils being preserved in those beds.

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scavenging could easily get a small piece of cartilage from a large shark into a small predator.

  • Enjoyed 1
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl said:

Still only seeing cartilage. Plus, those deposits are all fresh water. And finally, I've never heard of any invertebrate fossils being preserved in those beds.

I was able to contact the seller at last, and he told me about the attached image

Looks like it could be shark cartilage and a tooth below it. It’s from an Orthocanthus fresh water shark.”

You too believe it is a shark tooth below the cartilage?

Thank you!

013DAF41-34AF-4ADD-B80B-3CB07A322721.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Vopros said:

I was able to contact the seller at last, and he told me about the attached image

Looks like it could be shark cartilage and a tooth below it. It’s from an Orthocanthus fresh water shark.”

You too believe it is a shark tooth below the cartilage?

Thank you!

013DAF41-34AF-4ADD-B80B-3CB07A322721.jpeg

That doesn't look like an Orthacanthus tooth to me. Could be a fish scale or a bone fragment but it's really hard to be sure here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_4627.thumb.jpeg.08ccea1d248132603fbb1a579a0251e1.jpeg

The lighter area by the red arrow looks like coprolite, but most of this looks more like some sort of bone bed matrix to me. 
IMG_4634.thumb.jpeg.a1e5e24819e6ae588c21bfcfa608744e.jpeg

I think this might be an Orthacanthus denticle (from mucous membrane). I agree with the others regarding the cartilage. This might be a denticle as well.IMG_4629.thumb.jpeg.c817d08fe6eaaa95b19850cc3175fd32.jpeg

Edited by GeschWhat
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...