Vopros Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 (edited) I bought this rock online auction site. it was sold as a Permian Coprolite with bones from Oklahoma. it is 2 cm long. The last 5 images are microscopic. what do you think? Edited April 28, 2023 by Vopros Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Looks like a coprolite to me. @Carl @GeschWhat 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted April 29, 2023 Author Share Posted April 29, 2023 (edited) On 4/28/2023 at 8:03 AM, Fossildude19 said: Looks like a coprolite to me. @Carl @GeschWhat Thank you, Tim! I wonder what is this thing? It looks as skin, is it not? Edited April 29, 2023 by Vopros Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted April 29, 2023 Share Posted April 29, 2023 Looks more like bone or cartilage. 2 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted April 29, 2023 Author Share Posted April 29, 2023 53 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said: Looks more like bone or cartilage. Thank you, Tim! could you, please, tell me if all animals have cartilage, and how one could tell apart fossil skin and fossil cartilage. IMO they look kind-of similar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted April 29, 2023 Author Share Posted April 29, 2023 Also the thing in question is marked with the red arrow. What are the things marked with the blue arrows? Are they bones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted April 29, 2023 Share Posted April 29, 2023 I'm sorry, but I have very little knowledge of fossilized skin. But there were xenacanthid sharks where this was found, which to me, would indicate cartilage over skin. Like I said, it could also be bone, like some kind of ornamented fish bone. 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted April 29, 2023 Author Share Posted April 29, 2023 2 hours ago, Fossildude19 said: I'm sorry, but I have very little knowledge of fossilized skin. But there were xenacanthid sharks where this was found, which to me, would indicate cartilage over skin. Like I said, it could also be bone, like some kind of ornamented fish bone. Here is a closeup. In the upper portion of the image there are thin lines in between the features. Maybe this will help you to ID what it is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted May 1, 2023 Share Posted May 1, 2023 On 4/28/2023 at 11:03 AM, Fossildude19 said: Looks like a coprolite to me. @Carl @GeschWhat Sure looks legit to me. And I completely agree with chondrichthyan cartilage. Lots of that come from these beds and the taphonomy is not the type from which one would expect fossil skin. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted May 1, 2023 Share Posted May 1, 2023 Thanks for chiming in, @Carl ! BTW, @Vopros, Carl is the go to guy for coprolites. 2 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted May 1, 2023 Share Posted May 1, 2023 12 hours ago, Fossildude19 said: Thanks for chiming in, @Carl ! BTW, @Vopros, Carl is the go to guy for coprolites. And @GeschWhat, too. She really knows her stuff! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted May 1, 2023 Author Share Posted May 1, 2023 54 minutes ago, Carl said: Sure looks legit to me. And I completely agree with chondrichthyan cartilage. Lots of that come from these beds and the taphonomy is not the type from which one would expect fossil skin. Thank you, Carl! I wonder if this “chondrichthyan cartilage” could be actually coral? See the separation lanes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted May 1, 2023 Share Posted May 1, 2023 I wouldn't expect to find coral in a coprolite, but I would expect to find shark cartilage. Cartilage does look like this with the separation lines. 1 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hadrosauridae Posted May 1, 2023 Share Posted May 1, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Vopros said: Thank you, Carl! I wonder if this “chondrichthyan cartilage” could be actually coral? See the separation lanes? This is 100% cartilage, which is most likely shark cartilage from a xenacanthid. So this is a coprolite from a predator that ate a shark (among other things), but this doesnt look like a shark coprolite, even though they were known to be cannibalistic. That greatly narrows the range of critters it could be from. Edited May 1, 2023 by hadrosauridae additional info 1 1 "There is no shortage of fossils. There is only a shortage of paleontologists to study them." - Larry Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted May 1, 2023 Author Share Posted May 1, 2023 46 minutes ago, hadrosauridae said: This is 100% cartilage, which is most likely shark cartilage from a xenacanthid. So this is a coprolite from a predator that ate a shark (among other things), but this doesnt look like a shark coprolite, even though they were known to be cannibalistic. That greatly narrows the range of critters it could be from. Thank you! If this is shark’s cartilage, then is there a shark’s tooth on the attached image? One more question.. This Coprolite is very small (2 cm. In length). Is not this too small for an animal that fed on a shark? BTW at least in the modern time I did see some animals feeding on sharks. For example, here is a sea lion consuming a leopard shark. As you see there are seagulls trying to catch a piece. So I wonder, if his is possible that a bigger animal actually killed a shark and a smaller one (the one that left a Coprolite) was just feeding on the pieces? Also, this Coprolite is from Oklahoma. Were there sharks in Oklahoma? Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hadrosauridae Posted May 1, 2023 Share Posted May 1, 2023 Your pic doesnt look like a xenacanthid tooth (and yes, they were a very common freshwater shark in Oklahoma). Xenacanthid teeth are tri-cuspid. This is a permian shark tooth 1 1 "There is no shortage of fossils. There is only a shortage of paleontologists to study them." - Larry Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted May 1, 2023 Author Share Posted May 1, 2023 (edited) Thank you! If it is not a tooth, then what it is? It does not look as a bone either IMO. And there are more inclusions similar to this one. Some of them appear to have rims. Edited May 1, 2023 by Vopros Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted May 2, 2023 Share Posted May 2, 2023 22 hours ago, Vopros said: Thank you, Carl! I wonder if this “chondrichthyan cartilage” could be actually coral? See the separation lanes? Still only seeing cartilage. Plus, those deposits are all fresh water. And finally, I've never heard of any invertebrate fossils being preserved in those beds. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted May 2, 2023 Share Posted May 2, 2023 Scavenging could easily get a small piece of cartilage from a large shark into a small predator. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vopros Posted May 2, 2023 Author Share Posted May 2, 2023 1 hour ago, Carl said: Still only seeing cartilage. Plus, those deposits are all fresh water. And finally, I've never heard of any invertebrate fossils being preserved in those beds. I was able to contact the seller at last, and he told me about the attached image ”Looks like it could be shark cartilage and a tooth below it. It’s from an Orthocanthus fresh water shark.” You too believe it is a shark tooth below the cartilage? Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted May 2, 2023 Share Posted May 2, 2023 2 hours ago, Vopros said: I was able to contact the seller at last, and he told me about the attached image ”Looks like it could be shark cartilage and a tooth below it. It’s from an Orthocanthus fresh water shark.” You too believe it is a shark tooth below the cartilage? Thank you! That doesn't look like an Orthacanthus tooth to me. Could be a fish scale or a bone fragment but it's really hard to be sure here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeschWhat Posted May 6, 2023 Share Posted May 6, 2023 (edited) The lighter area by the red arrow looks like coprolite, but most of this looks more like some sort of bone bed matrix to me. I think this might be an Orthacanthus denticle (from mucous membrane). I agree with the others regarding the cartilage. This might be a denticle as well. Edited May 7, 2023 by GeschWhat 1 Lori www.areallycrappystory.com/fossils www.facebook.com/fossilpoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now