Jump to content

What could have left these marks?


Alexander D.G

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Found this gryphaea a while ago and have been pondering about what could have left these marks on this fossil, anybody want to take a crack at what it could be?

 

I had at first assumed that they were modern marks left by a tool of a fellow fossil collector but as can be seen in the first picture the shell 'bends' into the marks, which can only have happend while the shell was still growing. Thoughts?

 

Some general info:

- Location found: Vaches Noires

- Age: ~150 million years old

 

- Fotos:

IMG_0475.thumb.jpg.3ffc8d6b1e2fcc584af54a11cd4454cc.jpg

IMG_0472.thumb.jpg.eb23edbd52dd22fab7329f0b81b57064.jpgIMG_0471.thumb.jpg.32fb99da975369a4d48c2ef8c1512078.jpgIMG_0470.thumb.jpg.6a879e4044c3648486c2b9a8ac6c2b30.jpgIMG_0475.thumb.jpg.3ffc8d6b1e2fcc584af54a11cd4454cc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They look recent to me.

  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 1

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mark Kmiecik said:

They look recent to me.

If it were then why would the shell seem to have grown around the crack? If it were recent I would expect the lines of the shell to be continues, instead of the more M shape it has now with the crack in the middle.

 

image.png.aae492fcc8fe51e644e64668ce653f19.png

Edited by Alexander D.G
Typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it got tumbled along some rocks prior to fossilization 

  • I Agree 1

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

percussion marks

New to this terminology. If I understand it right you theorize that shell got hit by rocks either pre or post fossilisation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Alexander D.G said:

New to this terminology. If I understand it right you theorize that shell got hit by rocks either pre or post fossilisation?

yup

  • I found this Informative 1

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

Might be percussion marks.

 

4 hours ago, Mark Kmiecik said:

They look recent to me.

 

1 hour ago, Alexander D.G said:

If it were then why would the shell seem to have grown around the crack? If it were recent I would expect the lines of the shell to be continues, instead of the more M shape it has now with the crack in the middle.

 

image.png.aae492fcc8fe51e644e64668ce653f19.png

 

I have to go with growth interruption, either by damage or blockage. The normal growth lines before the marks and the deformed lines in line with and after the marks could not happen after the animal died - pre or post fossilization.

  • I Agree 2

Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys."

Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough."

 

My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection

My favorite thread on TFF.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...