Jump to content

Unidentified Fossil from Sarasota County Florida


Okeubler01

Recommended Posts

Sorry to say but it appears to be man-made

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'

George Santayana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The man-made diagnosis is likely due to that unusual groove running down one edge which makes it look more like something created. The texture does appear to be very worn bone though (some hints of cancellous spongy bone visible. The white incrustations on this piece seem to show that this was likely found offshore rather than a land find. If I had to guess I'd probably say it is a chunk of whale bone (very commonly found diving off the Venice, FL area). Would explain the whit marine invertebrate encrustations as well. Not seeing anything to indicate turtle/tortoise--many other broken bones end up being thin and flat. ;)

 

Any more info on where this was found?

 

 

Cheers.

 

-Ken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you both for the comments. I don't have any other information. I do agree about it probably coming from offshore. I received this from a friend that has gone on digs over the years. He has a large collection. I have many flat bones from diving off "Venice Beach" over the past decades. It has the some density, appearance, and general characteristics as my other bone samples that I have.

 

Cheers back...

 

Buddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/9/2023 at 3:03 PM, Okeubler01 said:

Thank you both for the comments. I don't have any other information. I do agree about it probably coming from offshore. I received this from a friend that has gone on digs over the years. He has a large collection. I have many flat bones from diving off "Venice Beach" over the past decades. It has the some density, appearance, and general characteristics as my other bone samples that I have.

 

Cheers back...

 

Buddy

@Okeubler01

Buddy, Can we see some additional photos of the edges/cross section? 

@digitKen, why couldnt that groove be a sulcus on a very large turtle shell fragment? The piece seems to narrow all along the one edge so I was wondering if it could match up and be a carapace/peripheral fragment or possibly even from the plastron?  I'm just wondering outloud? 

 

Regards, Chris 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Plantguy said:

Ken, why couldnt that groove be a sulcus on a very large turtle shell fragment? The piece seems to narrow all along the one edge so I was wondering if it could match up and be a carapace/peripheral fragment or possibly even from the plastron?  I'm just wondering outloud? 

Not precluding anything at this point with this unusual item. I've never seen a stock straight line run for 7+ inches on any piece of turtle/tortoise shell. The grooves in the carapace/plastron where the scutes meet have always been very narrow and not composed of multiple parallel linear features like this one.

 

The fact that one side seems to show very worn cancellous bone and the other smoother cortical bone is the only thing that's making me believe this is a fragment of a larger chunk of bone (cetacean?) and not a phosphatic imprint (or even blackened manmade object like a piece of mortar). It is curious but I don't see anything that will help to identify it to bone element nor species. Unless someone has seen a more complete specimen showing similar features, this may be yet another unidentifiable frag. On the off chance that this is something cetacean @Boesse would be the only person I know capable of hazarding a guess at a possible identification of this piece.

 

 

Cheers.

 

-Ken

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a fragment of a large baleen whale maxilla or possibly premaxilla. Further identification is not possible.

  • I found this Informative 5
  • I Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boesse said:

Looks like a fragment of a large baleen whale maxilla or possibly premaxilla. Further identification is not possible.

Awesome. Thanks Bobby! Ken!

Regards, Chris 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an article from the interweb - ResearchGate in particular showing a convincingly similar image of the above. The article states that the Right whale is the oldest of the baleen whale family @ 20 million years. Worth a peek:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Holotype-mandible-and-hyoid-of-Antwerpibalaena-liberatlas-IRSNB-M2325-A-mandibles-in_fig5_340804733

 

 

And some creative license grafting the OP's fossil segment into a Fossil Baleen Whale jawbone. You might need to squint and add fossil fairy dust on it to make it real. It was a combo of hi and lo res images.

 

992492834_BaleenWhalejawfossil.thumb.png.3ed7e2239fb84b076d030febf65c895d.png

 

 

Edited by SPrice
addendum
  • I found this Informative 2
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the conversation. I will note the comments in my identification file on this piece. Chris... Here are the additional pics you asked for. 

20230912_225729.jpg

20230912_225808.jpg

20230912_225820.jpg

20230912_225757.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Okeubler01 said:

Thank you all for the conversation. I will note the comments in my identification file on this piece. Chris... Here are the additional pics you asked for. 

 

 

 

 

thanks for the additional photos. I dug around in the garage and found a couple of samples of tortoise, couldnt find the turtle material to show why I was wondering and trying to envision where that linear feature might be found. They dont match your sample. Appreciate Ken's and Bobby's explanations/ID. Nice find! 

 

1879634777_Tortoiseshelllayeringwithinstain.jpg.0afd22f5ebdf934bd6b4ba43c836fa6b.jpg

image.png.b4fda1af7e3d8ceb8fcc3d336aad8e4e.png

Regards, Chris 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/12/2023 at 10:19 PM, SPrice said:

Here's an article from the interweb - ResearchGate in particular showing a convincingly similar image of the above. The article states that the Right whale is the oldest of the baleen whale family @ 20 million years. Worth a peek:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Holotype-mandible-and-hyoid-of-Antwerpibalaena-liberatlas-IRSNB-M2325-A-mandibles-in_fig5_340804733

 

 

And some creative license grafting the OP's fossil segment into a Fossil Baleen Whale jawbone. You might need to squint and add fossil fairy dust on it to make it real. It was a combo of hi and lo res images.

 

992492834_BaleenWhalejawfossil.thumb.png.3ed7e2239fb84b076d030febf65c895d.png

 

 

Looks nice at first glance, but what you can't see from the original image of the mandible is that it has a completely different looking cross-section - mandibles of right whales are nearly round to oval in cross-section. The maxilla is the upper, rather than lower jaw.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...