trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 (edited) I went to Rockport quarry in Michigan several times this year. And found this trilobite. A friend says it looks like Crassiproetus but i am not sure.... Thanks! In advance Edited November 9, 2023 by trilobites_are_awesome Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 Need a picture. 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share Posted November 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Fossildude19 said: Need a picture. Sorry forgot. Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 Any chance of teasing it out/uncovering a bit more? Also, a picture from directly above the trilobite would be helpful. 1 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share Posted November 9, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Fossildude19 said: Any chance of teasing it out/uncovering a bit more? Also, a picture from directly above the trilobite would be helpful. I don't think so the shale is very fragile and so is the trilobite. Also they are very rare. I will try to get more pictures. Edited November 9, 2023 by trilobites_are_awesome Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 Axis is too narrow for Crassiproetus. Possibly a Pseudodechenella. 2 1 ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share Posted November 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Kane said: Axis is too narrow for Crassiproetus. Possibly a Pseudodechenella. It's flat Except for the middle lobe. Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share Posted November 9, 2023 More pictures. Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 I'd be tempted to remove the rock covering the other half of the pygidium. 1 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 It's a risk, but I'd carefully whack it. 1 1 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share Posted November 9, 2023 I don't know if the rest of the pygidum is even there. @Fossildude19 why are there red lines? Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 30 minutes ago, trilobites_are_awesome said: It's flat Except for the middle lobe. I maintain my first identification . Tim's red lines indicate where you might carefully remove matrix with minimal damage to the specimen 1 1 ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 I'd wager the rest of the pygidium is there. If you were to use a dremel engraver with specialized tips, or, even a pin vise or exacto knife placed where the red lines are, you could "***GENTLY***" tap the matrix away from the fossil. 1 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 The Rockport Quarry Limestone does not have any trilobites. As Kane stated, Pseudodechenlla is a better match from the Bell Shale or the Ferron Point Formation. Ehlers, G.M., Kesling, R.V. 1970 Devonian Strata of Alpena and Presque Isle Counties, Michigan. Michigan Basin Geological Society, Geological Society of America, 130 pp. PDF LINK Stumm, E.C. 1953 Trilobites of the Devonian Traverse Group of Michigan. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 10(6):101-157 PDF LINK 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share Posted November 9, 2023 1 hour ago, piranha said: The Rockport Quarry Limestone does not have any trilobites. I have met two other people besides me who have found trilobites at Rockport in the black shale. Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted November 9, 2023 Share Posted November 9, 2023 20 minutes ago, trilobites_are_awesome said: I have met two other people besides me who have found trilobites at Rockport in the black shale. The Rockport locality has trilobites....the "Rockport Quarry Limestone Formation" does not. This dechenellid originated from either the underlying Bell Shale or the overlying Ferron Point Formation. Additionally, Crassiproetus is absent from both. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trilobites_are_awesome Posted November 9, 2023 Author Share Posted November 9, 2023 7 minutes ago, piranha said: The Rockport locality has trilobites....the "Rockport Quarry Limestone Formation" does not. This dechenellid originated from either the underlying Bell Shale or the overlying Ferron Point Formation. Additionally, Crassiproetus is absent from both. Thank you for the clarification. And thank you to all who helped ID it! Cheers! James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now