Jump to content

"Carpoid" from UK?


Mochaccino

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have this fossil from the Middle Ordovician Hope shales, Leigh, Shropshire, UK. It was labeled as a carpoid "Anfesta sp.". However I realize that it has complete bilateral symmetry and no plate-like structure, even for a carpoid. Besides, I googled "Anfesta" and that is a Ediacaran organism with triradial symmetry, so evidently incorrect. What could this be? I can't find anything like it online, but maybe a brachiopod internal mold?

 


 

IMG_0206.thumb.jpeg.07af3ab36541c111bb64ac47da0cde60.jpegIMG_0207.thumb.jpeg.b36bd4ab0d7052c1d1ebc962c2f3ca2c.jpegIMG_0208.thumb.jpeg.83de0d7e76e925abe853688f810fb457.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Done. :) 
 

This to my early morning eyes seems to be a phyllocarid or possibly a bivalve.

  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 3

...How to Philosophize with a Hammer

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get a phyllocarid vibe from this one as well, but I’m not certain, and not familiar enough with the geology it was found in. Wait for other opinions. 

  • Thank You 1

The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.  -Neil deGrasse Tyson

 

Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How certain are you of the locality and age?  If it was misidentified could that information be off too?  Maybe a label got switched?  I ask because this looks similar to a decapod (shrimp) cephalothorax, with a dorsal ridge leading to a pointy rostrum on one end.  There were no decapods in the Ordovician.  Of course, it might be something else altogether, 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • Thank You 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, FossilDAWG said:

How certain are you of the locality and age?  If it was misidentified could that information be off too?  Maybe a label got switched?  I ask because this looks similar to a decapod (shrimp) cephalothorax, with a dorsal ridge leading to a pointy rostrum on one end.  There were no decapods in the Ordovician.  Of course, it might be something else altogether, 

 

6 hours ago, Kane said:

Done. :) 
 

This to my early morning eyes seems to be a phyllocarid or possibly a bivalve.

 

5 hours ago, FossilNerd said:

I get a phyllocarid vibe from this one as well, but I’m not certain, and not familiar enough with the geology it was found in. Wait for other opinions. 


 

Thank you, It is quite possible the locality is wrong as well, as the info is all on one label and might've gotten switched. I'll see if I can find the original info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first impression was a seed. Two specialists concur with that assessment.

A similar analog from Oregon: Menispermaceae: Odontocaryoidea nodulosa

 

image.png.d6aa3fd39ff8ee8af3856f72e17ba8b2.png

 

Manchester, S.R. 1994

Fruits and Seeds of the Middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon.

Palaeontographica Americana, 58:1-205  PDF LINK

  • I found this Informative 6
  • I Agree 1

image.png.a84de26dad44fb03836a743755df237c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, piranha said:

My first impression was a seed. Two specialists concur with that assessment.

A similar analog from Oregon: Menispermaceae: Odontocaryoidea nodulosa

 

image.png.d6aa3fd39ff8ee8af3856f72e17ba8b2.png

 

Manchester, S.R. 1994

Fruits and Seeds of the Middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon.

Palaeontographica Americana, 58:1-205  PDF LINK


Interesting, I had not considered that! However according to the seller, whatever it is, the provenance is accurate as he collected it himself. So the Middle Ordovician Hope shales, Leigh, Shropshire, UK. I believe seeds did not exist until the Devonian. Do you think this is possibly a phyllocarid instead? That's the only one among those suggested so far that seems to be consistent with the age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/18/2023 at 2:00 AM, piranha said:

My first impression was a seed. Two specialists concur with that assessment.

A similar analog from Oregon: Menispermaceae: Odontocaryoidea nodulosa

 

image.png.d6aa3fd39ff8ee8af3856f72e17ba8b2.png

 

Manchester, S.R. 1994

Fruits and Seeds of the Middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon.

Palaeontographica Americana, 58:1-205  PDF LINK

I agree. 

It resembles a specimen I have labeled as Trigonocarpus

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png MotM August 2023 - Eclectic Collector

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is the two "bumps", which are not found in seeds. 

You can imagine if something like this was squashed, it might look similar to the fossil. Redonia is also found in the Hope Shs.

From Cope, 1999.

Screenshot2023-12-2108_08_29.png.27a73b247a027250e964b556b7488830.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me that can’t see the original photos? For me it looks like this, but it seems like everyone else can see it fine.IMG_2810.thumb.png.8aca6137f9e11bf80c64590f42eec912.pngIMG_2809.thumb.png.d4e82e9a3442f2fd3babae901c715162.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...