Rooster Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Please post pictures directly on the Forum, not on Facebook. Links go bad, then the pictures are gone forever. Also, location information should be added to the body of the post. People sometimes miss the tags. 1 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
val horn Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 I am sorry i am not even sure these are bone. Close up photos that show the internal surfaces will help.t would like to see trabeculae if present as ell as measured front back and side views of labelled 1,2,3 etc bones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rooster Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 Just now, val horn said: I am sorry i am not even sure these are bone. Close up photos that show the internal surfaces will help.t would like to see trabeculae if present as ell as measured front back and side views of labelled 1,2,3 etc bones. Ok, pretty certain the last photos are coprolite but I'll try to do better with pictures and descriptions next time I post. Thank you! 22 minutes ago, Rooster said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FB003 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Pictures are too small to make much of them. I don't see any coprolite here. Might be nothing but might be something. If you edit the post by deleting the link and adding the pictures themselves, it will open in a larger format so people can view them via the forum. *Frank* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 I don’t see anything fossil here either. In the future, do not forget to indicate the size in inches or cm of your objects to identify ! And if you have nothing to do it with, take a look at my signature ! Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 This does look like objects that are represented as being coprolites. These representations can be quite controversial though. If it was found in the same context as fossil bones that could be useful information. @Carl might want to weigh in on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brevicollis Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Looks like fossilized wood to me or an agate , but nothing too special . Are good signatures really that important ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 On 1/28/2024 at 4:15 AM, Rockwood said: This does look like objects that are represented as being coprolites. These representations can be quite controversial though. If it was found in the same context as fossil bones that could be useful information. @Carl might want to weigh in on this. I see nothing to suggest these are true coprolites, but you are right that things like this are very often sold as such. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now