Jump to content

Othniel C. Marsh

Recommended Posts

Below is an unidentified phytosaur tooth from the Norian of the Chinle Formation which I've been struggling to identify to a genus or species level.

 

20240216_174917.thumb.jpg.c5e5da634ee7c50f21722c89b52ff657.jpg

20240216_175028.thumb.jpg.ee52fc55d64adaa25637ca29dee50d78.jpg

 

Thanks in advance for any proposed ID's
Othniel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better lit, in focus pictures may be needed.  :unsure:

 

Cropped and brightened:

 

20240216_175028.jpg.89114cfb3e61872a0db9f5035bda1292.jpg   20240216_174917.jpg.46f544292985c5ff4e5d339a1bbc5d8e.jpg

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure phytosaur teeth have carinae and serrations, which this lacks. I'm getting an amphibian vibe from it.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2024 at 2:02 PM, Carl said:

Pretty sure phytosaur teeth have carinae and serrations, which this lacks. I'm getting an amphibian vibe from it.

 

I'll have to take a closer look at the tooth to see if either of the above are present but just very worn, but I think you're right. If it is an amphibian could it be Apachesaurus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Othniel C. Marsh said:

 

I'll have to take a closer look at the tooth to see if either of the above are present but just very worn, but I think you're right. If it is an amphibian could it be Apachesaurus?

Can't say I know my Chinle amphibians very well AT ALL, so no opinion there.

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A closer look has been taken and there are no serrations or carinae: just ridges. Apachesaurus is also probably too small for such a tooth to belong to it. I reckon that it belongs too an Anaschisma, as it appears to be the most common amphibian in the Chinle Formation and the only amphibian large enough to have such a tooth, but I will reserve my judgement until those with greater expertise in the field have given their opinion.

Edited by Othniel C. Marsh
  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...