Crinoids Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 Is there enough here to identify? I'm thinking maybe oreo, it is from Oklahoma Oligocene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danielb Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 I’m not familiar with Oklahoma but I’m thinking maybe mesohippus or miohippus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 2 hours ago, Crinoids said: I'm thinking maybe oreo, Hmmm.Close, but not quite a match, I feel. 5 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 I didn't know there was Oligocene fossils to be found in OK. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brevicollis Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 (edited) On 3/24/2024 at 6:35 AM, jpc said: I didn't know there was Oligocene fossils to be found in OK. I agree, and i've researched a bit, and found out : no eocene fossils are known from there. That means, its probably from the permian, cretaceous period or something like that, whose fossils are very much known from Oklahoma. But this migth help. I found out too, that the Sam Noble Museum has a website, where you can try to identify Oklahomian fossils whith the help of experts. Hope this helps ! https://samnoblemuseum.ou.edu/common-fossils-of-oklahoma/i-found-a-fossil/ Edited March 25 by Brevicolis Are good signatures really that important ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 The geology map of OK shows there is Cretaceous, then Pliocene... no Oligocene. http://ogs.ou.edu/docs/geologicmaps/GeologicMapofOklahoma.pdf Did you find this in Oklahoma? It does look Oliogocene-ish. It is certainly not Permian. I say that having very little knowledge of Pliocene mammals. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahnmut Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 I agree that kind of teeth had not been invented in the permian as far as I know. 1 2 Try to learn something about everything and everything about something Thomas Henry Huxley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted March 24 Share Posted March 24 (edited) That looks like the lower third molar of an early horse - maybe even Hyracotherium or whatever the accepted genus is now. Who said it was found in Oklahoma? @fossillarry Edited March 24 by siteseer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpc Posted March 25 Share Posted March 25 I thought Hyracotherium lower m3 as well. Which is Eocene. Still, no Eocene in OK. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 13 hours ago, jpc said: I thought Hyracotherium lower m3 as well. Which is Eocene. Still, no Eocene in OK. Yeah, labels must been mixed up somewhere. That's probably from Wyoming or maybe New Mexico or Colorado. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fossillarry Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 I also have not read about any Eocene age deposits in Oklahoma, nor Oligocene deposits for that matter. The lower molar is certainly a perissodactyl, most likely an equid. could be " Hyracotherium " or perhaps Orohippus. The tooth does not look exactly like any specimen in my collection of Early Eocene equid lower teeth, so I am not a hundred per cent certain as to the identity of this specimen. To bad it does not have better locality data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now