New Members distant_smile Posted April 15 New Members Share Posted April 15 Hi all. Both ammonites found in Bristol, UK, BS31, as we're the shells and coral. Not much else to say but would be nice to get a bit more info from the pros? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 Since the ammonite bits are only partials, it would be necessary to know the precise stratigraphy, since many different ammonite species have similar structures. However if the finds were made in the Early Jurassic (Lias), then I could hazard the guess that the first one could be part of the outer whorls of an Arietites. It could also help in identifying the coral, and although I'm no expert on that subject, I do know that these are more difficult to id and often a very close examination of the internal structure is necessary, sometimes even by sectioning. The bivalve is poorly preserved and difficult for me to determine, although maybe someone more familiar with this area has an idea? Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members distant_smile Posted April 15 Author New Members Share Posted April 15 Thank-you Ludwigia your comments are very much appreciated. I hoped the size of the large ammonite may narrow it down as in the past I've only found small ones...but I think I also knew it was a long shot due to the degredation 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aman Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 Hi, I'm quite familiar with the fossils that are commonly found on the Somerset coast, which I believe to be the same formation (blue lias), and therefore of similar age, as the Jurassic rocks that underly parts of Bristol and the surrounding areas. The first ammonite that you have could only be either a Coroniceras (also known as Arietites) or a Paracoroniceras because of its size, however it's difficult to narrow it down past that because of how little there is of it. I've attached a picture of a complete, but poorly preserved, Coroniceras that I found recently. It was about 25 cm across, but I have found several specimens that are much larger (several over 40 cm, a few over 50 cm, one much, much larger than that) and much better preserved than this one. Unfortunately the second ammonite is too poorly preserved to give a definitive ID, but due to its size I would hazard a guess that it might be a piece of one of the two types of large ammonite that I mentioned before. The coral looks like it is from the genus Isastrea, though the specific species I cannot say. As for the bivalves, it is difficult to say what they are exactly as these are once again not very well preserved; they appear to be some sort of clam from what I can see, possibly small examples of Plagiostoma, which is a large bivalve quite common in the blue lias, though it is difficult to know for sure. I hope this has cleared some things up for you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members distant_smile Posted April 16 Author New Members Share Posted April 16 Thanks! My own, albeit amateur, research lead me to coroniceras and paracoroniceras due to the size so its great to hear you say that. And thanks for the educated guesses on the others...at least I now know what general area they may be in and it gives me a bit more knowledge for identifying in the future. Much appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Kmiecik Posted April 16 Share Posted April 16 On 4/15/2024 at 11:42 AM, distant_smile said: as we're the shells and coral. I'm pretty sure you are not. Mark. Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members distant_smile Posted April 16 Author New Members Share Posted April 16 Sorry Mark I dont quite understand the comment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Members distant_smile Posted April 16 Author New Members Share Posted April 16 (edited) Lol sorry just re-read it. Yes Mark we are not the shells *were. Nice catch Edited April 16 by distant_smile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now