Newbie_1971 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 (edited) I went out today for a couple of hours and found some good stuff. Could someone help me out please, and let me know what the bumpy grayish brown thing is with the pattern (in the first photo), and the last 3 photos (besides the last, which is an isotelus) thank you! Edited April 25 by Newbie_1971 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ted coulianos Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 "bumpy thing" is a fragment of bryozoan colony, maybe Monticulipora sp. ; enrolled trilobites look like Flexycalymene (meeki ??); looks like you were in the Ordovician. Hopefully, someone else will chime in and confirm. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 For the bryozoan ID, do you know which formation you were in? 1 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbie_1971 Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 Ordovician Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Yes, not quite what I meant. The Ordovician is split into Early, Middle, and Late and in North America, the upper parts of the Late Ordovician are known as the Cincinnatian Series. This is broken into stages and I think you were likely in the Richmondian Stage. But these describe the age of the rock. Each of the actual sequences of rock is differentiated into Formations which each have a distinctive appearance. If we know which formation we are in, we can often find a faunal list and narrow down the species found there. Anyway, that could be Monticulipora as mentioned above. 1 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FossilNerd Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 7 minutes ago, Tidgy's Dad said: Yes, not quite what I meant. The Ordovician is split into Early, Middle, and Late and in North America, the upper parts of the Late Ordovician are known as the Cincinnatian Series. This is broken into stages and I think you were likely in the Richmondian Stage. But these describe the age of the rock. Each of the actual sequences of rock is differentiated into Formations which each have a distinctive appearance. If we know which formation we are in, we can often find a faunal list and narrow down the species found there. Anyway, that could be Monticulipora as mentioned above. I think you are on the right track and of course agree with you. I know he usually hunts in areas similar in age (if not exactly the same) as St. Leon, so I think your assumption is right with Richmondian in age. I’d even venture a further guess and say he typically hunts the Liberty Formation looking for the flexi rollers found in the “butter shale” there, but that is only an educated guess from his previous finds and these might possibly have come from other Richmondian Formations like Whitewater, or Myville…errr… I mean Waynesville… 1 The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it. -Neil deGrasse Tyson Everyone you will ever meet knows something you don't. -Bill Nye (The Science Guy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPS Ammonite Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 4 hours ago, Tidgy's Dad said: The Ordovician is split into Early, Middle, and Late and in North America, the upper parts of the Late Ordovician are known as the Cincinnatian Series. This is broken into stages and I think you were likely in the Richmondian Stage. You are mixing your stratigraphic terms. Early, Middle and Late refer to Ordovician epochs, not series. Epochs are divided into ages and not stages. The Cinncinnatian Epoch and Richmondian Age are local terms and not used in newer stratigraphic charts such as the one from the GSA: 1 1 My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned. See my Arizona Paleontology Guide link The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 7 hours ago, DPS Ammonite said: You are mixing your stratigraphic terms. Early, Middle and Late refer to Ordovician epochs, not series. Epochs are divided into ages and not stages. The Cinncinnatian Epoch and Richmondian Age are local terms and not used in newer stratigraphic charts such as the one from the GSA: Yes, I understand this. I never said that Early, Middle amd Late were series, I probably should have mentioned the word epoch, but then went on to say specifically that in North America it is known as the Cincinnatian and Richmondian. Thus I did make it clear that these were your "local terms". Stages is a valid term according to the ICS Subcommission. See Perhaps it would be useful for you to read some of this which also refers to the Cincinnatian. https://ordovician.stratigraphy.org/ 2 1 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 And as far as I understand it, "Series" is the Chronostratigraphic unit (strata) and "Epoch" is the Geochronologic unit (time). The ICS places both as alternates at the same spot in their chart. ChronostratChart2023-06.pdf 1 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now