Megalodon_hunter Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 (edited) I know a little German. By no means an expert but a friend of mine was talking to me about hunting Megs in EU. He has found a few 3-4 inch megs. He was excited about telling me about a recent Megalodon reconstruction in Austria. Do you see something new here? I've been trying to track down the research bits and pieces for this but have had relatively no luck with my Deutsch skills. Here are some good pics http://www.naturfotoworkshop.at/artikeltippserfahrungsberichtefotoblog/fotoblog/files/91470e3878118dbf3af1aa7df345b411-31.html Just wanted to see what others thought about the dentition of this 9 meter Megalodon. Located at a muesuem in Lintz. (cannot find it on their site) http://www.landesmuseum.at/ueber/ausstellungen/sammlungspraesentation/event-detail/natur-oberoesterreich/ Edited June 9, 2011 by Megalodon_hunter "One of these day's I'm going to find a tooth over 3inches." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmorefossil Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 Well I have a problem it doesnt seem to.have posterior teeth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megalodon_hunter Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 Well I have a problem it doesnt seem to.have posterior teeth Yes I think I see one. "One of these day's I'm going to find a tooth over 3inches." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmorefossil Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I guess it does have a few lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeD Posted June 8, 2011 Share Posted June 8, 2011 I was wondering about that split in the middle of the lower jaw and the two small teeth there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megalodon_hunter Posted June 8, 2011 Author Share Posted June 8, 2011 @Mike that was what I was wondering about. Wondered what the experts think about this.. Very interesting indeed. "One of these day's I'm going to find a tooth over 3inches." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 I would assume those are supposed to be parasymphyseal positions. I have seen an Eocene Carcharocles parasymphyseal and there is another thread on the forum where a photo of a possible Oligocene parasymphyseal has been posted. I am not aware of a megalodon parasymphyseal ever being proposed much less shown. Someone must've wanted to account for that possibility. I was wondering about that split in the middle of the lower jaw and the two small teeth there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Hi, I wouldn't want to say stupidities, I do not see very well on photos, but I have the impression that teeth were put back to front : the lingual face on the place of the labial face ! On shark jaws, arc of teeth turns inward of the mouth, not towards the outside. It seems to me that below on the right, we can see that the curvature of teeth goes towards the outside. I have already seen a photo of a french reconstruction of a jaw where teeth had been put in the wrong direction... Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nandomas Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 (edited) Hi, I wouldn't want to say stupidities, I do not see very well on photos, but I have the impression that teeth were put back to front : the lingual face on the place of the labial face ! On shark jaws, arc of teeth turns inward of the mouth, not towards the outside. It seems to me that below on the right, we can see that the curvature of teeth goes towards the outside. I have already seen a photo of a french reconstruction of a jaw where teeth had been put in the wrong direction... Coco It also lacks all but one replacement teeth series , but I like it Edited June 9, 2011 by Nandomas Erosion... will be my epitaph! http://www.paleonature.org/ https://fossilnews.org/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THobern Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Hi, I wouldn't want to say stupidities, I do not see very well on photos, but I have the impression that teeth were put back to front : the lingual face on the place of the labial face ! On shark jaws, arc of teeth turns inward of the mouth, not towards the outside. It seems to me that below on the right, we can see that the curvature of teeth goes towards the outside. I have already seen a photo of a french reconstruction of a jaw where teeth had been put in the wrong direction... Coco The "display side" (for Megalodon teeth, the side with the bourelette) is not the labial side, it's the lingual side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THobern Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 So, you are looking at these teeth as if you were inside the shark's mouth, not as if you were looking at the shark head on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenInTime Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 The model is actually on view in Linz, Austria. They speak German in Austria, but it is in fact a country of its own. The extension .at stands for .a(us)t(ria). There is a small interview with the animal preparator responsible for this monster-size reconstruction, from which I can conclusivey summarize that the reconstruction is pretty much entirely based on extrapolation of the anatomy of a Great White shark. I believe I have met the preparator a few years ago, and his field of specialty is actually reconstructions of Pleistocene terrestrial mammals. I will try to contact him and ask how this dentition came into being, he may want to learn from your constructive criticism, if you are willing to lead him to a more accurate placement of the teeth? Cheers, Mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megalodon_hunter Posted June 10, 2011 Author Share Posted June 10, 2011 @FrozenInTime Thanks.. When I have more time I will try to do more research online.. "One of these day's I'm going to find a tooth over 3inches." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megalodon_hunter Posted June 10, 2011 Author Share Posted June 10, 2011 This is based on research from the Pisco Formation in Peru. That is the last bit of information I could gleam.. "One of these day's I'm going to find a tooth over 3inches." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamia Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Hi folk, do you have any questions about the reconstructed megalodon dentition!? then write to w.kraus@pal.rwth-aachen.de and/or to lutzandre@yahoo.de P.S.: they wrote a paper about the life-sized model: "Der Präparator"-magazine, issue 2009, with English abstract, with many pics and details, see: http://www.praeparation.de/zeitschrift/ausgaben/dp_2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now