Jump to content

Articulated Id Help


bones brigade

Recommended Posts

Hello all. These bones were found in the 'Badlands' area of Alberta, Canada and we were wondering if anyone could Identify them? I've been leaning in the direction of astragalus (ankle bone)?

What does everyone think? Thanks in advance for all the input.

post-9951-0-36371200-1347497701_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if I added too many pictures in seperate posts. Hope these are clear enough. I have many more if anyone would like to see different angles etc.

post-9951-0-55928100-1347498344_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if I added too many pictures in seperate posts. Hope these are clear enough. I have many more if anyone would like to see different angles etc.

No worries! We're all here for the pictures any way. ;) Sorry I can't help with your bone, with these nice pictures though I'm shure you'll get an id pretty fast.

Also, welcome to the forum!

Edited by AgrilusHunter

"They ... savoured the strange warm glow of being much more ignorant than ordinary people, who were only ignorant of ordinary things."

-- Terry Pratchett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No worries! We're all here for the pictures any way. ;) Sorry I can't help with your bone, with these nice pictures though I'm shure you'll get an id pretty fast.

Aslo, welcome to the forum!

Thanks!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The largest bone is, I think, a calcaneum; compare it to cow or bison.

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The largest bone is, I think, a calcaneum; compare it to cow or bison.

Do you think the size is right for it to be a Bison of today or are we looking at something a little older?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, calcaneum and astragalus

... too small for a Bison and too large for white tail deer but it looks like the calcaneum tuber has not yet fused so perhaps a juivinile?

Darrow

http://lamar.colostate.edu/~lctodd/tarsals.htm

http://www.uwyo.edu/reallearning/bisonmedia/calcaneus.mov

http://www.uwyo.edu/reallearning/bisonmedia/astragalus%28r%29.mov

http://www.bonesanddirtrule.com/publications/Hill%20et%20al.%202008%20QSR.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the next question then becomes; How old is it? The bones were found in a layer of a hoodoo quite far from the surface. Are we looking at ice age animals here or bones from the cows/bison of today? Also thank for the links and info!

Edited by bones brigade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These bones appear to be fairly recent. Have you tried the scorch test on them?

Cows are a fairly recent introduction to North America. If the bones are older than a few hundred years, there are other bovids, like the musk ox, which could be the source. You'll probably need a comparative collection for an ID to musk ox.

---------------------------------------------

Collagen is a fiberous protein that serves as connective tissue in bones and muscles. It does not preserve well in a fossil. As collagen decomposes, it may be replaced in the hydroxyapatite latticework by minerals from the depositional environment (e.g. silica dioxide dissolved in groundwater).

Bone reinforced with exogenous minerals is said to be "mineralized."

A 'burn test' or 'match test' will usually indicate whether there is collagen remaining in a bone -- scorched collagen has an awful smell. Teeth - dentin and enamel - contain hydroxyapatite, but don't contain collagen, so the 'burn test' on a tooth would be a waste of time.

http://pristis.wix.com/the-demijohn-page

 

What seest thou else

In the dark backward and abysm of time?

---Shakespeare, The Tempest

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I did the 'burn test' and the picture pretty much shows what happened. The smell was pretty bad! So based on the burn test and the smell can you put a relative age to the bones? Just an odd place that we found them semi buried (protruding from the earth) 30ft or so below surface we thought they were probably pretty old.

post-9951-0-18392800-1347592768_thumb.jpg

Edited by bones brigade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you dug a 30 foot hole? or they were found 30 ft below the top of a river bank? if a river bank find, they may have simply been lodged in the side of the bank when the water was higher

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a river bank. A hoodoo or shelf type area in the Badlands of Alberta. You can see all the layers of earth as in the picture. You basically drop below and are able to view all the layers of the earth without ever having to dig! Quite the experience and an amazing place. Think Grand Canyon but without the river running through.

post-9951-0-98006800-1347595083_thumb.jpg

Edited by bones brigade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The test indicates that it is not permineralized, which can only suggest that it is of comparatively recent origin. If all other evidence (age range of the taxon, in this case) is in conflict with the age of the stratum from which it was collected, then it needs be considered that it may have been 'reworked' into the older deposit, perhaps by an old stream channel.

What other material is in that layer?

"There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant

“Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley

>Paleontology is an evolving science.

>May your wonders never cease!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because it was on the side of some badlands outcrop does not mean it actually came out of the outcrop. Recent cow bones will very often get covered with loose sand or mud that is eroding out of the Cretaceous rock, and then the sand/mud dries out and can seem hard, although it is still quite soft and easy to dig compared to the original mudstone or sandstone. Generally you'll see this on flat areas very close to the base of a steeper outcrop, or in the small channels that form along the surface of the outcrop. These channels carry down any fossil or modern bones they encounter, jumble them together, and partially bury them in reworked sand/mud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the photo! See how the sediment on top of the bones is a lighter grey, and doesn't have the same cracked texture as the original mudstone around it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see your point on how bones could be washed from a flat area into a channel but I really dont see how that could have happened in my situation because there was no flat top for this to be washed from. The area was basically a large hoodo in Drumheller. I think the loose sediment was caused from my daughter and I sliding down the side of the hoodoo. The bones also did not come out of the earth easily. They were solidly embedded into the cracked mudstone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...