Gizmo123 Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Can anyone help me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Bob Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 The pictures are a bit burry, anyway you can post better ones? "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." Upton Sinclair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo123 Posted November 2, 2012 Author Share Posted November 2, 2012 I think they are teeth are these pictures better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Can you please tell us the size? I suspect that it is a stream-worn piece of chert. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo123 Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Around 2 inches long and 1 inch wide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 I'll stick with chert (or flint, or chalcedony). The form is, to me, too amorphous to represent a biological entity, and it is not any tooth I have ever seen. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo123 Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 So it isnt a fossil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 It's very interesting in any case! For what it's worth, chert sometimes contains microfossils, but I would enjoy it's good looks the way it is "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo123 Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 Thanks for helping me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herb Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 I'll stick with chert (or flint, or chalcedony). The form is, to me, too amorphous to represent a biological entity, and it is not any tooth I have ever seen. I would agree. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go. " I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me "When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes "can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now