Jump to content

Is Think This Is Part Of A Bivalve Shell (Maybe)?


RonE

Recommended Posts

Found in Fossil Creek was totally covered in mudstone when I found this. Not even sure it's a fossil.

post-11366-0-61264700-1364101521_thumb.jpg

post-11366-0-49690600-1364115158_thumb.jpg

Edited by RonE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How old are the sediments where it was found? A direct view on the margins, where the shell was broken, may help, but it can be a fragment of a heavily weathered oyster.

araucaria1959

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found the specimen in a pile of dirt and gravel that the city dug out several years ago. There are a large number of Texigrphaea in the same pile of dirt which is what I was really looking for (the kids my daughter teaches love the fossils once I polish them up.)

post-11366-0-86105900-1364126427_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it looks like a fragment of an oyster.

araucaria1959

What he said.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"_ Carl Sagen

No trees were killed in this posting......however, many innocent electrons were diverted from where they originally intended to go.

" I think, therefore I collect fossils." _ Me

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."__S. Holmes

"can't we all just get along?" Jack Nicholson from Mars Attacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is just a fragment, how big could oysters get during the Cretaceous.

Edited by RonE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...