docdutronc Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 I trade this plant with my friend Hans Steur from Holland and he says : "During the Early Devonian (405 - 385 million years ago) several other groups of plants developed. They had the common feature of being rather small (not higher than half a meter) and simply structured. Thus the plant Sawdonia ornata had no leaves, but it did have spines. The function of the spines was probably to enlarge the surface for the assimilation of carbon dioxide from the air" this sample comes from Glasgow aera ,lower devonian ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bmorefossil Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 very cool, i can see the spines in the picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nicholas Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 Very nice my friend, it is an exceptional fossil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 A very ancient lineage, and an important fossil; there are a number of papers written on the Scottish deposits. Here is an illustration I found: "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bmorefossil Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 A very ancient lineage, and an important fossil; there are a number of papers written on the Scottish deposits.Here is an illustration I found: very nice illustration, is there leaves in the illustration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 ...is there leaves in the illustration From what I've read, they are probably fruiting (spore) bodies. "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bmorefossil Posted December 26, 2008 Share Posted December 26, 2008 From what I've read, they are probably fruiting (spore) bodies. hmm thats cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mommabetts Posted December 27, 2008 Share Posted December 27, 2008 Very nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plantguy Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 Hey Bruno, I might start a stir by dredging up this really ancient thread of yours (how far can we go back without starting a new thread) but I was excited when I got a hit when searching in the forum for Sawdonia and saw this good info. Anyways, could you repost a picture of your specimen if you still have it? I think it got lost when they migrated to the new system. So, I acquired the following early plant fossil recently with no label and I've been looking for some comparative material. I'm still working to see if I might acquire some provenance info but its not looking good. It has the saw-toothed appearance along its stems and it vaguely appears to be branching. What do you think? Are there other genera that look similar? Thanks, Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plantguy Posted May 30, 2010 Share Posted May 30, 2010 Hey Bruno, I might start a stir by dredging up this really ancient thread of yours (how far can we go back without starting a new thread) but I was excited when I got a hit when searching in the forum for Sawdonia and saw this good info. Anyways, could you repost a picture of your specimen if you still have it? I think it got lost when they migrated to the new system. So, I acquired the following early plant fossil recently with no label and I've been looking for some comparative material. I'm still working to see if I might acquire some provenance info but its not looking good. It has the saw-toothed appearance along its stems and it vaguely appears to be branching. What do you think? Are there other genera that look similar? Thanks, Chris Well, I located the provenance label and then some! A literal jackpot: Psilophyton princeps DAWSON var. ornatum (=Sawdonia HEUBER) from GROS-CAPAUX-OS, Near D'Aiguillon on N. Shore of Gaspe' Bay, Gaspe Peninsula, P.Q. Canada. Late Devonian (Upper Part) Battery Point FM, Gaspe' SS Group. Collected by Canright 9/4/59. There is still some confusion about the naming but I also found some additional literature that helps explain the variations---could be some more recent discussions/publications but here's what that article said: From "A New Species of Sawdonia with Notes on the Origin of Microphylls and Lateral Sporangia" Patricia G. Gensel, Henry N. Andrews and William H. Forbes, Botanical Gazette, Vol. 136, No. 1 (Mar, 1975) "ANANIEV and STEPANOV (1968) have retained the binomial Psilophyton princeps Dawson for the plant. The nomenclautre is complex and difficult and has been dealth with in detail by HUEBER and BANKS (1967) and HUEBER (1971). The description by ANANIEV and STEPANOV is a good one, and their restoration drawings give what we believe is an accurate portrayal of the plant. We have chosen to accept the nomenclatorial decision of HUEBER and BANKS (1967) in which the binomial Psilophyton princeps Dawson isused for naked or spiny plants bearing terminal clusters of sporangia and the binomial Sawdonia ornata (Dawson) Hueber is applied to fossils that DAWSON (1871) orginally described as P. princeps var. ornatum, a spiny plant with laterally borne sporangia." Bruno, I still would like to see your specimen photos if you have any. Regards, Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdutronc Posted June 1, 2010 Author Share Posted June 1, 2010 Hi Chris Here are the pictures ,the provenance label is : Auchensail Scotland ,Emsian (lower devonian ) Bruno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plantguy Posted June 2, 2010 Share Posted June 2, 2010 Hi Bruno, thanks so much for posting the photos. Yours is a very nice specimen of an early land plant indeed! From Scotland too--nice! When you compare the two specimens they definitely both show those characteristic spiny scale-like flaps and sure do look very very similar. I'd love to see the type specimens and original description but for now I am very happy to have validated that it is indeed a very early plant. Would love to see some sporangia but maybe there is a microscope in my future which will allow a closer inspection...but I am happy without seeing any just the same. Any further comparison/analysis at this time is way out of my league. Again, I really do appreciate the great photos. Thanks! Regards, Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now