Wrangellian Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I have seen burrows lined with similar patches of slickensides but this looks more like shell or bark, right? Reminds me of Calamites stem too but I guess if there were any chance of that you would have considered it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missourian Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 Also, it's strange how the 'shell' material is fractured and separated as if the cylinder was had been stretched from the ends rather than merely flattened as one would expect with a crushed shell. It's as if the sediment inside had expanded. Context is critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roz Posted October 30, 2014 Share Posted October 30, 2014 I don't see any encrusting fossils on my specimen. Welcome to the forum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Also, it's strange how the 'shell' material is fractured and separated as if the cylinder was had been stretched from the ends rather than merely flattened as one would expect with a crushed shell. It's as if the sediment inside had expanded. If marine animals and terrestrial plants are both being considered it seems possible that an influx of fresh water caused the expansion by the same principle thought to be involved in the formation of syneresis cracks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erose Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 My understanding is that these are coprolites. But boy-o-boy I wish I could tell you where I learned that. Messing with my identifications again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now