Jump to content

Silurian Sponge/rugose?


Pumpkinhead

Recommended Posts

This is from the Fossil Hill formation and Silurian in age. It does look somewhat like part of a rugose coral, but I also thought sponge because from the side view it is not symmetrical. The one side slopes downwards and the other upwards- I would expect a rugose coral to be much more uniform. Its structure just doesn't "feel" like a solitary coral to me and it is much larger than the colonial rugose I find there, which I believe to be arachnophyllum. Another difference between it and the colonial rugose I find is is that the columella is much less pronounced, which I don't think is due to poor preservation as the septal structures as they are fairly well pronounced. Incidentally, there are 60 septa present which is a multiple of four- so I think there's evidence on both sides. Thought I'd share it with all you. What does the fossil forum community think?

Ill grab some examples of what I think are "typical" examples of rugose corals where I am for comparison as well when I'm out this afternoon.

Thanks,

Pumpkinhead

post-14411-0-98973300-1438089819_thumb.jpg

post-14411-0-75177000-1438089829_thumb.jpg

post-14411-0-27644600-1438089837_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with FossilDAWG...A coralite of an Arachnophyllum.See this photos on TFF galery and compare with yours http://www.thefossilforum.com/index.php?/gallery/image/19949-arachnophyllum-sp-silurian-louisville-kentucky-usa/.

The geological age matches with the age of the formation where do you found it.

Edited by Guguita2104
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it looked similar, but what caused me to be suspicious was that its about five times as large as the largest corallite I've ever found on an arachnophyllum specimen. As I said earlier, it is also not symmetrical from a side view- in all of the colonial rugose corals I've ever found the septa slope upwards from the columella and if you were to cut a corallite in half you you would have more or less a mirror image on both sides. What do you guys think would cause these differences? Has anybody ever come across arachnophyllum specimens this large?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fossil with dime to scale- for comparison this is about the size of an american penny

post-14411-0-79091800-1438096408_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The size depends of many factors (including the water "composition")...They absorb the elements they need from water, conjugating the water calcium and the carbonates to form aragonite (their exoskeleton is "made" of this mineral).If these and other elemnts weren't in the correct rate the growth will be limited.The irregularity can be derived of many factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two species of Arachnophyllum in the Fossil Hill, and one has much larger corallites. I'll have to check which is which when I get home later.

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I've been trying to make a compendium of the common species there so if you wouldn't mind shooting me both of the species names that would be great

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Come to think of it, if anyone wants to help with it just send me a pm and I will send you the table so you know where it is needed to chip in. I still don't have anything at all for the molluscs there or the solitary rugose and a lot of the other groups need help as well. This would probably be helpful for collectors on the niagara escarpment if completed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might check Chonophyllum, I have afew of these from the middle Silurian in Tennessee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...