Jump to content

Discophyllum berberum question


Wrangellian

Recommended Posts

This specimen seems to be covered in some sort of natural limey scale, but looks like it would look great if it could be removed. I can pop it off by hand with a needle/pin, bit by bit, but it's tricky to not puncture the fossil itself.

Do any of you preppers have any experience with this type of coating, and can it be removed with any ease (whether with simple tools or expensive air tools that I don't have), without abrading the fossil surface underneath? In any case it's probably not going to be done by me, but if I knew what anybody was capable of I would have a better idea of what to do with this piece, ie. keep it, pass it on, sell it (and at what price), etc.

Thanks in advance

post-4372-0-43498000-1444111588_thumb.jpg

post-4372-0-66946300-1444111638_thumb.jpg

Bottom of piece to show hardish platy sandstone matrix. I'm not sure the fossil itself is as resistant damage as this side would be, though. I guess it would be a case of 'try it and see'.

Edited by Wrangellian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another pic (fluor. light)

post-4372-0-75555200-1444111998_thumb.jpg

Here is a pic from the web of another specimen which has less scale on it, that might give an idea of what mine would look like if the stuff could be removed:

post-4372-0-94920100-1444112050_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coating itself wouldn't be the problem, but rather the consistency and type of preservation of the fossil surface immediately under it. I can't really tell from the photos if there's shell substance there or if it's just a mold, in which case the connecting layer could be "sticky", making it hard to get it off without afflicting damage to the fossil. Depends also on how soft or hard the fossil is in relation to the coating.

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im just glad its not me having to face that prep job. Looks like a tuff one. Im going to wish you the very best of luck.

RB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The scale looks (as far as one can tell from a photo) as if it may be some sort of carbonate deposit. If so, it may be removable with dilute acetic acid, basically vinegar. Usually sandstone is impervious to such treatment, if so the fossil would not be affected. You could try some vinegar on a part of the matrix away from the fossil and see if it dissolves or loosens the crust (so it can be easily flaked off) before risking treating the actual fossil.

Don

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coating itself wouldn't be the problem, but rather the consistency and type of preservation of the fossil surface immediately under it. I can't really tell from the photos if there's shell substance there or if it's just a mold, in which case the connecting layer could be "sticky", making it hard to get it off without afflicting damage to the fossil. Depends also on how soft or hard the fossil is in relation to the coating.

There is no shell surface, it's basically a sandstone mold. The bits that I have popped off don't seem to have pulled anything off the fossil surface, but as I mentioned, it's hard to poke them off with a needle without poking into the fossil surface when the scale gives way.

The scale looks (as far as one can tell from a photo) as if it may be some sort of carbonate deposit. If so, it may be removable with dilute acetic acid, basically vinegar. Usually sandstone is impervious to such treatment, if so the fossil would not be affected. You could try some vinegar on a part of the matrix away from the fossil and see if it dissolves or loosens the crust (so it can be easily flaked off) before risking treating the actual fossil.

Don

Is there not also some carbonate holding the sandstone grains together?

I might try it and get back to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well I tried the diluted vinegar idea and it came out not too bad. There were some loose grains left over but that was probably inevitable (they may have been attached mainly or only to the calcite) but I'm still not sure that the fossil surface is not a little bit 'weathered' by the treatment, and that an airscribe treatment applied directly to the calcite would not have been better. But this was certainly easier than the tedium that would have entailed (and the cost which I would incur, as I don't have an airscribe)...

post-4372-0-85609700-1446956500_thumb.jpg post-4372-0-19838200-1446956511_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...