DrPhil Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Welcome to the forum. Hm. These are not looking like fossils to me. The first looks to be a concretion (although there may be some fossils on the stone behind this one if you could get a closeup of it). The second looks like weathering, possibly iron oxide or an eroding geode cavity judging by the fine crystals. Others will doubtless chime in shortly to give their view. In the interim, could you say more about where these were found? That assists our members in being able to have a grasp on the geology of the area to facilitate a more accurate identification. 1 ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeschWhat Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 I second what Kane said. Welcome! Lori www.areallycrappystory.com/fossils www.facebook.com/fossilpoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 Yup. Concretion and crystal druse. Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fifbrindacier Posted March 25, 2017 Share Posted March 25, 2017 I agree with all fellows up there. "On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry) "We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes." In memory of Doren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now