Fossil Claw Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 I found this Cryptolithus bellus collar that looks to be fairly complete in Northern Kentucky today. I am never found anything but fragments of collars before. Trying to figure out if this is the top or the bottom in the trilobite and whether or not it's worth prepping to see if the rest of it is there or not. I'll post more pictures after I get it home and clean it. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pumpkinhead Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 My initial thoughts would be that you are looking at the underside of the trilobite as the glabella of Cryptolithus is quite convex and would likely be visible from a dorsal view (If present). I'm also fairly certain that the collar should slope downwards away from the cranidium, so if what you are looking at is in fact the ventral view of the collar you would expect it to have an angle and slope downwards to the inside rather than the outside. If you can't understand my convoluted attempt at explaining what I see then the bottom right image of Cryptolithus tesselatus should be illustrative. Notice the way the collar "slopes" away from the cheeks and glabella. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piranha Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 Shaw & Lespérance 1994 classify eastern North American Cryptolithus as morphs rather than distinct species, synonymous with the type species: Cryptolithus tessellatus "lt is our contention that all specimens described from eastern North America by many writers under the names Cryptolithus tessellatus Green, Cryptolithus lorettensis Foerste, and Cryptolithus bellulus (Ulrich) or synonyms thereof defined by Whittington (1968) or Hughes et al. (1975) are morphs, races, or regional variants of Cryptolithus tessellatus. These specimens thus do not merit formal taxonomic status as species, sibling species, or subspecies." Shaw, F.C., & Lespérance, P.J. 1994 North American biogeography and taxonomy of Cryptolithus (Trilobita, Ordovician). Journal of Paleontology, 68(4:)808-823 "Bassler (1915) dispatched Ulrich’s (1878) Trinucleus bellulus to Cryptolithus. Curiously, Ulrich did not compare C. bellulus to the well-established C. tessellatus Green, 1832; more recent workers (for example, Whittington, 1968; Hughes et al., 1975; and Shaw and Lespérance, 1994) consolidated C. bellulus within that species. Babcock (1996) recognized C. tessellatus as the only species of Cryptolithus from the Ohio Ordovician." Brandt, D. S., & Davis, R.A. 2007 Trilobites, Cincinnati, and the “Cincinnati School of Paleontology”. In: Mikulic, D.G., Landing, E., & Kluessendorf, J, (eds.) Fabulous Fossils: 300 Years of Worldwide Research on Trilobites. New York State Museum Bulletin: 507:1-248 PDF LINK "Cryptolithus which is sometimes called the lace-collar trilobite (Davis, 1985) because of its distinctive cephalic fringe, is present through much of the Cincinnatian Series strata of southwestern Ohio. Most specimens have been collected from the Kope, Fairview, and Grant Lake Formations. Only one species, C. tessellatus Green, seems to be present in the Cincinnatian of Ohio (Shaw and Lespérance, 1994). In some older literature, this species was identified as C. bellulus (Whittington, 1968)." Babcock, L.E. 1996 Phylum Arthropoda, Class Trilobita. In: Feldmann, R.M., & Hackathorn, M. (eds.) Fossils of Ohio Ohio Division of Geological Survey, Bulletin 70:90-113 Several species of Cryptolithus were historically identified in Upper Ordovician strata of eastern North America (see, for example, Whittington, 1968). At least two species, C. tessellatus and C. bellulus, were recognized in Kentucky and surrounding states. Differences in the various species were based on the number of arcs of perforations or holes in the frill or slight shape differences. Subsequent statistical analysis of specimens found that slight variations in shape and the number of arcs or pits varied in all species and that the specimens were better considered variations (morphs) of one species rather than multiple species. Presently, all of the Upper Ordovician Cryptolithus from the eastern United States are considered Cryptolithus tessellatus (Shaw and Lespérance, 1994). text from: Kentucky Geological Survey 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevonianDigger Posted June 23, 2018 Share Posted June 23, 2018 I too, believe that you are looking at the ventral side of the anterior margin. The glabella, and perhaps even a complete cephalon may be contained within. Very cool! 1 Jay A. Wollin Lead Fossil Educator - Penn Dixie Fossil Park and Nature Reserve Hamburg, New York, USA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossil Claw Posted June 25, 2018 Author Share Posted June 25, 2018 Turns out I also found a Meadowtownella crosotus. At the very least it's a partial but it looks like the whole thing could be there we'll have to prep it to find out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ynot Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 17 minutes ago, Fossil Claw said: the whole thing could be there we'll have to prep it to find out. Darwin said: " Man sprang from monkeys." Will Rogers said: " Some of them didn't spring far enough." My Fossil collection - My Mineral collection My favorite thread on TFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Castle Rock Posted June 26, 2018 Share Posted June 26, 2018 In your third photo, I believe that I can see what MIGHT be a complete Cryptolithus ceph, just below the inch cube? Please post after prep pictures....CURIOUS! Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJB Posted June 26, 2018 Share Posted June 26, 2018 Good luck. I hope one or both are complete for you. RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossil Claw Posted June 26, 2018 Author Share Posted June 26, 2018 12 minutes ago, RJB said: Good luck. I hope one or both are complete for you. RB Thanks. Given the rarety I am going to likely turn it over to a pro to do for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now