ziepe Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Good afternoon everybody! During a fieldtrip in Silesia (Poland) last year I visited a rather large spoiltip looking for plant fossils. The spoils left behind by the mining company indicate they still use (or used) the old method to separate the coal from the surrounding debris, allowing the coal to be 'baked' (e. g. the presence of pyrite that turns into sulphuric acid -h2so4- under the influence of wind and rain, ...) something typical for the majority of spoiltips I visited in Western Europe. Unfortunately I have no detailed geological data on the age of the debris in the spoiltip but there is no doubt this is Silesian (upper Carboniferous) in age. I even tend to think this is Westphalian in age based on the fossils found, but let's keep it to upper Carboniferous to be sure. I found several species of Lepidodendron, some Eusphenopterids, both Stigmaria ficoides and S. stellata, etc... And this never-seen-before 'thing'. My initial thought was that this could be some sort stem/branch but, in my 20 years of collecting Paleozoic plants, I have never seen the repetative triangular pattern that covers the branch (or tube if you like). Perhaps this could be some sort of tracefossil? Since my ichnofossil-knowledge is extremely limited someone here can help me out? The height of the 'tubes' varies between 2 and 3mm. Have a nice day! Sven 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalmayshun Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 cant help out, but it is certainly beautiful. I am eager to find out opinions about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tidgy's Dad Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Very interesting. I think the closest to it would be some club moss branches, but none I've seen are quite like this. Life's Good! Tortoise Friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innocentx Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Possibly a type of graptolithina. "Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 27, 2018 Author Share Posted August 27, 2018 29 minutes ago, Tidgy's Dad said: Very interesting. I think the closest to it would be some club moss branches, but none I've seen are quite like this. Hi Tidgy's Dad, we can rule out Lycopsid branches due to the lack of microphylls. Sven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 27, 2018 Author Share Posted August 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, Innocentx said: Possibly a type of graptolithina. Hi Innocentx, the graptolithina went extinct in the Mississippian, lower Carboniferous so, stratigraphically these don't match. Sven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miocene_Mason Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Would say lycopod leaves, but the chevron are not something I’ve seen. I’m interested to see what this turns out to be Edit: I know realize that Adam suggested this with club moss, which is a lycopod. “...whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.” ~ Charles Darwin Happy hunting, Mason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innocentx Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 26 minutes ago, ziepe said: graptolithina went extinct in the Mississippian, lower Carboniferous I don't know how deeply they go in their mining efforts to obtain coal in that area. Just a thought. "Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innocentx Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 I must add... intriguing fossil, very crisp! "Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auspex Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 I note that the "tire tracks" do not taper, but are the same width end-to-end. This seems un-plantlike. Then there is this: If this is a bivalve shell, it may be a clue to the "tire tracks". I have seen fossil 'clam tracks' that are similar to these. 4 "There has been an alarming increase in the number of things I know nothing about." - Ashleigh Ellwood Brilliant “Try to learn something about everything and everything about something.” - Thomas Henry Huxley >Paleontology is an evolving science. >May your wonders never cease! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westcoast Posted August 27, 2018 Share Posted August 27, 2018 Protovirgularia? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 14 hours ago, Auspex said: I note that the "tire tracks" do not taper, but are the same width end-to-end. This seems un-plantlike. Then there is this: If this is a bivalve shell, it may be a clue to the "tire tracks". I have seen fossil 'clam tracks' that are similar to these. Those are 2 valid points Auspex! That ecosystem was home to a lot of primitive bivalves like Carbonicula and such who are common (and almost stereotypical) for Pennsylvanian deposits. I'll try to make sharper/detailed pictures of the possible bivalve when I return home this evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 15 hours ago, WhodamanHD said: Would say lycopod leaves, but the chevron are not something I’ve seen. I’m interested to see what this turns out to be Edit: I know realize that Adam suggested this with club moss, which is a lycopod. Microphyllous leaves (typical for Lycopods) have a single vein which divides the leaf in two parts. This distinctive charateristic is missing here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 7 hours ago, ziepe said: Those are 2 valid points Auspex! That ecosystem was home to a lot of primitive bivalves like Carbonicula and such who are common (and almost stereotypical) for Pennsylvanian deposits. I'll try to make sharper/detailed pictures of the possible bivalve when I return home this evening. I can't make any more detailed pictures with my camera. The possible bivalve is a little bit bigger than the height of the so-called "tire tracks": 3-4 mm. I took a look under a magnifier and it could very well be a bivalve, the specimen is very weathered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 This bit is intriguing too. (I've lived on the Coal Measures for decades and never seen anything matching this post!) Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TqB Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 I'm sure everyone has googled around but Climactichnites is worth looking at (although it's Cambrian)... 2 Tarquin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 Speeking of Googling around... Yesterday I read the following article (recommended by @paleoflor) from the Acta Palaeontologica Polonica: "Trace fossils from Late Carboniferous storm deposits, Upper Silesia Coal Basin, Poland" by Arkadiusz Gluszek. (1998) Some "close but no sigar"-matches but overall a good starting point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 Follow this link (instead of the embedded PDF preview): Trace fossils from Late Carboniferous storm deposits, Upper Silesia Coal Basin, Poland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 I'm not sure, but you may be in the right direction considering them ichnofossils, Sven. They look like that for me, something in the line of Nereites, maybe. " Ichnogenus Nereites MacLeay, 1839 Nereites missouriensis (Weller, 1899) Figs 13A, B. Material. - Several tens of specimens. Description. - Iarge forms (Fig. 13B): full relief, loosely meandering, unbranched burrows with segmented infill surrounded by the zone of reworked sediment. The burrows curve in all directions. The filling structure is the most characteristic feature of the burrows. It is formed by irregular, dark, fine-grained menisci separated by lighter sediment similar to the host rock in terms of lithology. The distance between menisci is not constant. It is relatively small or even zero in the horizontal parts of the burrow increasing in the oblique parts. The zone of reworked sediment is commonly faded but still paler than the surrounding sediment and may reveal presence of the transverse structure. The width of the meniscate filling is between 4 and 5 mm. The total width of the burrow is 10 mm. The maximum preserved length is 12 cm. Small forms (Fig. 13A' B): winding, hońzontal and unbranched burrows, typically preserved as full relief but also as concave hyporelief. The burrows have a dark meniscate filling but menisci are poorly distinguishable making of the infill appear as structureless. Some menisci are separated by sandy films. The infill is framed by the zone of reworked sediment that is paler than the host one. Internal, leaf-shaped striation can be detected within the best developed lateral parts of the zone. The total width of the burrows is 4 to 9 mm. The faecal core diameter is 1 to 3 mm and is constant along a single burrow. The length can reach 20 cm. Remarks. - The small forms prevail in the material studied. The large forms have a more distinct meniscate filling. Also, the vertical component of burrow direction is more frequent among the large burrows. This would be explained by lower energy loss of a relatively larger animal, digging through the sediment, in comparison to a smaller one. N. missouriensis has been interpreted as the work of a worm-like, deposit-feeder (Seilacher & Meischner 1965; Conkin & Conkin 1968; Chamberlain 1971; Hantzschel 1975) or other organisms such as mollusks, arthropods, or holothuroids (Rindsberg 1994). " excerpt from Głuszek, A. 1998. Trace fossils from Late Carboniferous storm deposits, Upper Silesia Coal Basin, Poland. Acta Pąlaeontologica Polonica 43(3): 517-546. " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, ziepe said: Follow this link (instead of the embedded PDF preview): Trace fossils from Late Carboniferous storm deposits, Upper Silesia Coal Basin, Poland I cant beleave you had the same idea. I studied it yesterday, but, as always, I'm too late for the party. " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziepe Posted August 28, 2018 Author Share Posted August 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, abyssunder said: I cant beleave you had the same idea. Great minds... Both Arthrophycus and Nereites show recognisable features compared to the 'thing' I found, but are -in my opinion- not a match. I'll try to dig deeper into this matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 I would go with trace fossils, cf. Nereites, although I could be wrong on this. picture from here 1 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innocentx Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 1 hour ago, TqB said: Climactichnites is worth looking at (although it's Cambrian).. There's a lot of revision of previous conclusions made regarding fossils, as more material is unearthed. Wouldn't rule it out. 1 "Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abyssunder Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 Fascinating thread, at least for me! Tarquin, you may be right! Innocentx, you have a very clear mind! Thanks for the suggestion of reinterpretation! link 1 " We are not separate and independent entities, but like links in a chain, and we could not by any means be what we are without those who went before us and showed us the way. " Thomas Mann My Library Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innocentx Posted August 28, 2018 Share Posted August 28, 2018 1 hour ago, abyssunder said: Innocentx, you have a very clear mind! "Journey through a universe ablaze with changes" Phil Ochs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now