Tony Eaton Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 (edited) ptychodus latissimmus, my most unique ptychodus Up until recently I hadn't been on a dedicated fossil hunt for over 6 years. This was the haul on the last trip about 7 years ago. My wife found this pytchodus latissimmus, I think the only shark tooth she ever found. Well, a good find! I have probably over 100 ptychodus, but the first latissimmus. We were collecting a Kamp Ranch site in Frisco TX, although this was actually from just inches below Kamp Ranch in the Britton Layer of Eagle Ford (uppermost Cenomanian), which at least at this site was a condensed pebble layer / buff clay layer. The Metoicoceras fragment helped tell me that this was Britton. Otherwise I would have assumed simply a clay layer of Kamp Ranch. Edited October 6, 2009 by Tony Eaton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeD Posted October 6, 2009 Share Posted October 6, 2009 Wow! That's huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kknight Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 Ok, I am jealous; there is a Kamp ranch site so close to home and I don’t know about it! Amateur Nature Photographer / Fossil Hunter www.naturesstage.com Kevin Knight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CreekCrawler Posted November 19, 2009 Share Posted November 19, 2009 That's one nice Ptychodus Tony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Eaton Posted November 21, 2009 Author Share Posted November 21, 2009 Thanks. I finally got the Farish and Welton Texas Shark Teeth book and read that P. Latissimmus is common in the Atco contact area although I've yet to find one there. According to the book, Latissimmus is not known to be in Kamp Ranch or Britton which makes me wonder if I have ID'd this tooth correctly. I have recently found two Ptychodus teeth from P.O.C. found by sieving with window screen that are rather unusual, perhaps "rarer" than the above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barefootgirl Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 Well dont tease us, show us some picks. Love that tooth by the way! In formal logic, a contradiction is the signal of defeat: but in the evolution of real knowledge, it marks the first step in progress toward victory. Alfred North Whithead 'Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siteseer Posted November 22, 2009 Share Posted November 22, 2009 Thanks. I finally got the Farish and Welton Texas Shark Teeth book and read that P. Latissimmus is common in the Atco contact area although I've yet to find one there. According to the book, Latissimmus is not known to be in Kamp Ranch or Britton which makes me wonder if I have ID'd this tooth correctly. I have recently found two Ptychodus teeth from P.O.C. found by sieving with window screen that are rather unusual, perhaps "rarer" than the above. Yes, your tooth is about four million years older than the oldest known occurrence of latissimus as of the publication of that book (1993). Your tooth has ridges too prominent to be polygyrus so I think it is latissimus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Eaton Posted November 22, 2009 Author Share Posted November 22, 2009 (edited) My son spending the night at a friend's house so I had a chance to use his scanner and get a descent image of the ptychodus teeth. Here is the odd one. The scan doesn't convey the fact the whole thing is only 2mm thick all the way across. I guess this could be a corner tooth for a common ptychodus species? Or maybe P. Rugosus, both thinner and earlier than expected. This one is perhaps ptychodus sp as described in Welton and Farrish book. Still a bit odd IMO as although difficult to tell in this scan there is a small cusp next to the larger one. Taking a second look, maybe a symphysial tooth? Here is ptychodus sp I think. A closer to the book example. I wonder if this is some form of hybodus? Only 1mm thick the whole way across. Ah, completely unrelated except for it is from POC. Seems too hard / crystalized to be a recent pearl so I'm think a shiny fossil one ;-) Edited November 22, 2009 by Tony Eaton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now