Jump to content

NJ Possible Mastodon Find


The Jersey Devil

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, frankh8147 said:

 

Joseph,

 

I brought this and a few more specimens with the same coloration. The preservation wasn't right and they all correlated to modern mammals. Since then, the bones have deteriorated slightly (where my bones that are clearly Cretaceous have not) so I fully agree with them.

 

My take on this (open to interpretation) on potential Pleistocene bone from Monmouth County is that unless something is diagnostically from a Pleistocene animal, it's not going to get identified as such. As stated by others, mineral staining is more severe here than in other locations and there is a long history of both domestic and feral animals whose bones end up up in the streams.

 

To take it a step further; every single fossil from the Pleistocene I have seen from this location is actually brown rather than black (of course the bone could be re-deposited but if that's the case, I give up). I'd be very interested in seeing a black fossil bone from this location that is diagnostically from a Pleistocene animal.

 

Again, this is all up for discussion but that's been my experience.

 

Your interpretation makes sense. Do you use the burn test often on post-Cretaceous bone?

“You must take your opponent into a deep dark forest where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one.” ― Mikhail Tal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank,

 

I would say  that the bone you posted is a dino bone shard, but it would help to see it in person.   

 

Also I  have some random large chunks of black Pleistocene bone.  Far from identifiable, but the bone structure and size leaves only the possibility of Pleistocene.   

 

---Wie Wasser schleift den Stein, wir steigen und fallen---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, non-remanié said:

Frank,

 

I would say  that the bone you posted is a dino bone shard, but it would help to see it in person.   

 

Also I  have some random large chunks of black Pleistocene bone.  Far from identifiable, but the bone structure and size leaves only the possibility of Pleistocene.   

 

I think we talked about this one a while back, I wish I would've brought it yesterday but I'll just show it to you next time.

 

It's surprising light but of course, I would definitely appreciate you taking a look at it. Here is the inside.

IMG_20190414_115719.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These new pictures definitely make me reconsider the previous statement.  It is probably modern.  There's definitely recent bone that end up looking like this.  The other edge looked more solid.

 

---Wie Wasser schleift den Stein, wir steigen und fallen---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...