Jump to content

Uk ammonites


Notidanodon

Recommended Posts

hi guys. sorry the pics are upside down but i wasnt sure how to turn them all the right way up

1.sphaeroceras brongniarti? that 's what it said on the label but it didnt look like that when i looked it up:P

IMG_4657-compressed.thumb.JPG.a1af6420dfc13248e2194396b51164d7.JPGIMG_4658-compressed.thumb.JPG.b02388445605ccc237b401f6c69bf825.JPG5ef681e8efa72_IMG_4660-compressed(1).JPG.216ce1558391ea4d7a8c7be313ea08ec.JPGIMG_4659-compressed.thumb.JPG.f8d20b2220054f64a2c14274a7e09762.JPG

 

 

 

 

2. i couldnt read the label  as emillia want a species name i could find, any help would be appreciated

IMG_4663-compressed.JPG.2ce0b9a745f52342112d0f6e8421784d.JPGIMG_4664-compressed.JPG.420bed73da6bd4df64ec005b86a232ed.JPGIMG_4661-compressed.JPG.9fa6f6eb29292283bd523556527ad4bc.JPGIMG_4665-compressed.JPG.be8443abd0b41a8cb53407fdd65c820c.JPG

 

IMG_4662-compressed.thumb.JPG.85f2640e753cb0e39bbf21fe466790be.JPG

 

 

 

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMG_4658-compressed.thumb.JPG.b02388445605ccc237b401f6c69bf825.jpg IMG_4657-compressed.thumb.JPG.a1af6420dfc13248e2194396b51164d7.jpg  IMG_4659-compressed.thumb.JPG.f8d20b2220054f64a2c14274a7e09762.jpg

 

IMG_4661-compressed.JPG.9fa6f6eb29292283bd523556527ad4bc.jpg  IMG_4662-compressed.thumb.JPG.85f2640e753cb0e39bbf21fe466790be.jpg

  • I found this Informative 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am definitely not sure but I have found some beautiful  sphaeroceras in my time. Maybe we have to call the man on this one. @Ludwigia

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also not quite sure on these two, although I believe that they belong to the same genus. The first one is at any rate not a Sphaeroceras. If anything, then they are both a fine-ribbed species of Emileia (check out the spelling here). Makes you wonder about the correctness of the given stratigraphy if the finder couldn't even spell one of the genus names correctly.

  • I found this Informative 3

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

I'm also not quite sure on these two, although I believe that they belong to the same genus. The first one is at any rate not a Sphaeroceras. If anything, then they are both a fine-ribbed species of Emileia (check out the spelling here). Makes you wonder about the correctness of the given stratigraphy if the finder couldn't even spell one of the genus names correctly.

Thanks for your attempts to help:P the collector whose collection these came from (recognisable from the labels) was well versed in species/stratiagraphy and had large collections from these dorset localities so i feel the original labels are right. however, they have been passed around online a bit so its possible that the labels got mixed up so i'm not sure whether to trust the labels especially after the glaring identification error, would an identification be possible with certain camera angles that i didnt take?^_^

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, will stevenson said:

 would an identification be possible with certain camera angles that i didnt take?^_^

No, not really. I can't do better than I already have, and Byron seems to agree with me.

  • I found this Informative 1

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, fossils-uk said:

Likely both are Emileia cf. brocchi 

Thanks^_^

 

3 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

No, not really. I can't do better than I already have, and Byron seems to agree with me.

i see that came across as rude, i meant identification to a species level, thanks for your help

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, will stevenson said:

Thanks^_^

 

i see that came across as rude, i meant identification to a species level, thanks for your help

No, you weren't rude, just direct, as I was :)

  • I found this Informative 1

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...