Jump to content

Ohio Seashell fossil


DMcLY

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Harry Pristis said:

 

I decided to accept the OP's account of the fossils.  If we accept an Ordovician age for the fossils, they could easily be from a little south of Huntsville in the Late Ordovician Cincinnatian Series, likely the Richmondian Stage.  Strophomena nutans is abundant in the Ft. Ancient Member of the Waynesville Formation.

Yup, but S. nutans is the wrong shape.

Brachiopod: Strophomena

Agree with Cincinnatian, probably either Maysvillian or Richmondian. but could be S planumbona, S. concordensis  or one of a couple of others.

  • I found this Informative 4

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciating all of you folks weighing in on my little rock.  And no, Harry Pristis, it is surely from the aforementioned quarry; no other possibility.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...