Jump to content

From the Kiamichi Formation Cretaceous… north Texas Part three


98feetdeep

Recommended Posts

Here’s  the last item…(also threw in a the last photo of a good ammonite remnant, this one had great ridges)

…this curve looks like ammonite but doesn’t have the ridges the others in the area all seem to have..stumped. I’m leaning toward ammonite….

thanks
patrick

E452F8E6-5B9D-4AEF-9B90-536D67A987FE.jpeg

DF33694C-55D8-40C6-81C5-B2EAF4F5A2D0.jpeg

126ABC5B-9C6D-40DB-AF17-B647D09D5C3B.jpeg

AF589691-C19D-4A47-9385-B5DC1C84D327.jpeg

71516DE7-8EB6-4C84-967A-5DC30F4F2529.jpeg

D71802DD-7EB1-4204-B4CB-C1E6E5B7C37D.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could also be an infilled burrow/ichnofossil of some sort.

 

@JohnJ

  • I Agree 2

    Tim    -  VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER

   MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png      PaleoPartner.png.30c01982e09b0cc0b7d9d6a7a21f56c6.png.a600039856933851eeea617ca3f2d15f.png     Postmaster1.jpg.900efa599049929531fa81981f028e24.jpg    VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png  VFOTM  --- APRIL - 2015  

__________________________________________________
"In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks."

John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~   ><))))( *>  About Me      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the first is a burrow.  In a fragment that large, you would typically see evidence of septa on the sides and an impression of the siphuncle on the inner radius if it was part of a Kiamichi ammonite.

The human mind has the ability to believe anything is true.  -  JJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...