Jump to content

Macrasters and mortoniceras from local creek


Shaun-DFW Fossils

Recommended Posts

Johnson county, TX creek finds from yesterday afternoon. Unexplored section of a creek that has been productive for me with every visit. The mortoniceras arringtoni and drakei are in great shape on both sides (most of them) and only 2 of the macrasters are compressed or missing a chunk.

FB6CF7F5-ED47-4045-8812-AFA431F71FB0.jpeg

0E4001CC-0F86-4BB8-A6AE-9C11300BAFE9.jpeg

D84E77C3-2F7A-46E8-A089-57D9257496F8.jpeg

AFF3F926-FE09-4128-9C3D-5C3C4DB07E13.jpeg

63AA848D-F3C1-4920-81BA-DDD933C25840.jpeg

Edited by Shaun-DFW Fossils
  • Enjoyed 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice finds. :)

However, I am a little confused. You have "Drakeoceras" in your tags, but "drakei" in the post. I'm assuming that this should be drakei, a species, Is there a Drakeoceras drakei? Or is this Mortoniceras drakei?

This is also why it is a good idea to use correct nomenclature and italicise the genus and species with the genus always being capitalized and the species never capitalized.

Edited by Tidgy's Dad
  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 1

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Tidgy's Dad said:

Nice finds. :)

However, I am a little confused. You have "Drakeoceras" in your tags, but "drakei" in the post. I'm assuming that this should be drakei, a species, Is there a Drakeoceras drakei? Or is this Mortoniceras drakei?

This is also why it is a good idea to use correct nomenclature and italicise the genus and species with the genus always being capitalized and the species never capitalized.

Thanks, good point! Sorry for the lack of clarity. I think there was a proposed change from mortoniceras to drakeoceras. Perhaps I should have said mortoniceras (drakeoceras) drakei and mortoniceras (drakeoceras) arringtoni. I welcome correction if I am wrong in that. Thanks for all who share their knowledge with this noob (me)!

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Shaun-DFW Fossils said:

Thanks, good point! Sorry for the lack of clarity. I think there was a proposed change from mortoniceras to drakeoceras. Perhaps I should have said mortoniceras (drakeoceras) drakei and mortoniceras (drakeoceras) arringtoni. I welcome correction if I am wrong in that. Thanks for all who share their knowledge with this noob (me)!

Crying.gif.6169ad803f8323cb485b2395901f4e56.gif

  • Enjoyed 2

Life's Good!

Tortoise Friend.

MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160-1.png.60b8b8c07f6fa194511f8b7cfb7cc190.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice finds!

 

  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 1

"There is no shortage of fossils. There is only a shortage of paleontologists to study them." - Larry Martin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shaun-DFW Fossils said:

Johnson county, TX creek funds from yesterday afternoon. Unexplored section of a creek that has been productive for me with every visit. The mortoniceras arringtoni and drakei are in great shape on both sides (most of them) and only 2 of the macrasters are compressed or missing a chunk.

FB6CF7F5-ED47-4045-8812-AFA431F71FB0.jpeg

0E4001CC-0F86-4BB8-A6AE-9C11300BAFE9.jpeg

D84E77C3-2F7A-46E8-A089-57D9257496F8.jpeg

AFF3F926-FE09-4128-9C3D-5C3C4DB07E13.jpeg

63AA848D-F3C1-4920-81BA-DDD933C25840.jpeg

My friend Mercer did some research and it appears several of the ammonites I found are a different species than drakei or arringtoni, they’re actually mortoniceras (drakeoceras) gabrielense! This is the kind of nerdy info that makes me happy. I’ll have to keep one of them for my personal “keepers” collection. 

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JamieLynn said:
1 hour ago, JamieLynn said:

Good stuff! Do you know what this one is? I have found a few similar in Georgetown Formation / Duck Creek Formation in Central Texas. I have not been able to discern what genus. 

0E4001CC-0F86-4BB8-A6AE-9C11300BAFE9.thumb.jpeg.3e5454a287aee505798f1a6cdcd023f7.thumb.jpeg.fd6fba9ffb2ed24b0a5be205bc1679fb.jpeg

Thank you Jamie! I do not know for sure at this moment. I find lots of ammonites here in various life stages, so I’m guessing it’s a young mortoniceras (drakeoceras) drakei because I find those most often. The gabrielense I found occur sporadically throughout the Fort Worth formation but not all over the place, and they have 2 nodules along each side of the ridge/sephuncle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great finds. Amazing, great stuff!!

  • Thank You 1

Bulldozers and dirt Bulldozers and dirt
behind the trailer, my desert
Them red clay piles are heaven on earth
I get my rocks off, bulldozers and dirt

Patterson Hood; Drive-By Truckers

 

image.png.0c956e87cee523facebb6947cb34e842.png May 2016  MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png.a47e14d65deb3f8b242019b3a81d8160.png.b42a25e3438348310ba19ce6852f50c1.png May 2012 IPFOTM5.png.fb4f2a268e315c58c5980ed865b39e1f.png.1721b8912c45105152ac70b0ae8303c3.png.2b6263683ee32421d97e7fa481bd418a.pngAug 2013, May 2016, Apr 2020 VFOTM.png.f1b09c78bf88298b009b0da14ef44cf0.png.af5065d0585e85f4accd8b291bf0cc2e.png.72a83362710033c9bdc8510be7454b66.png.9171036128e7f95de57b6a0f03c491da.png Oct 2022

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so cool. Do you know which geologic formation it is?

  • Thank You 1

“Not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think” -Werner Heisenberg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jared C said:

so cool. Do you know which geologic formation it is?

Great question! My map shows Grayson, but a geologist I trust says Fort Worth, I am not knowledgeable enough to know if these are interchangeable or separate. I also see paw paw just west of Grayson, so I have more education to undergo! Not far from Duck Creek formation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Shaun-DFW Fossils said:

My map shows Grayson, but a geologist I trust says Fort Worth, I am not knowledgeable enough to know if these are interchangeable or separate

they are two different formations: Fortworth limestone being older than the pawpaw and grayson above it. I'm not as familiar with the lithology of the north texas formations, but I do know that the Grayson is usually a marl, not a limestone. 

 

What's likely the case is that though your area is mapped as Grayson, the creek cuts below the grayson and pawpaw to hit the limestone fort worth formation below it. 

  • I found this Informative 1
  • I Agree 1

“Not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think” -Werner Heisenberg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Shaun-DFW Fossils said:

Great question! My map shows Grayson, but a geologist I trust says Fort Worth, I am not knowledgeable enough to know if these are interchangeable or separate. I also see paw paw just west of Grayson, so I have more education to undergo! Not far from Duck Creek formation

When we were talking about this I forgot to ask what map your using? And if anyone reading this can explain 'undivided' formations I would appreciate. It does get confusing in areas around there with underlying and overlapping formations and pocket map isn't 100% accurate. Sometimes I can tell by color and rock type otherwise think you have to go by associated fossils. 

  • I found this Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Shaun-DFW Fossils said:

Great question! My map shows Grayson, but a geologist I trust says Fort Worth, I am not knowledgeable enough to know if these are interchangeable or separate. I also see paw paw just west of Grayson, so I have more education to undergo! Not far from Duck Creek formation


When you use the geological map of Texas realize that the map does not often show the correct formations at the bottom of small narrow canyons because the map scale won’t allow. The formations usually are correct for the top of the canyon on either side. Go back and see if you can find typical Grayson fossils at the top of the canyon. Depending on how deep and canyon is you might encounter 1 or 2 formations below the Grayson.

  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lone Hunter said:

When we were talking about this I forgot to ask what map your using? And if anyone reading this can explain 'undivided' formations I would appreciate. It does get confusing in areas around there with underlying and overlapping formations and pocket map isn't 100% accurate. Sometimes I can tell by color and rock type otherwise think you have to go by associated fossils. 

I started out with the Wikipedia (I know I shudder at mentioning the name) map, but Mercer Brugler introduced me to the Mancos app, so I’ve been using Mancos. Even in creeks, sometimes I notice it seems “off.” I know not all creeks are the same depth, so I understand the variability to an extent. I find the conlinoceras in one spot showing to be deep in the woodbine, but then the other spot is fairly far into the Eagle ford shale. I assume my lack of understanding is probably my own ignorance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DPS Ammonite said:


When you use the geological map of Texas realize that the map does not often show the correct formations at the bottom of small narrow canyons because the map scale won’t allow. The formations usually are correct for the top of the canyon on either side. Go back and see if you can find typical Grayson fossils at the top of the canyon. Depending on how deep and canyon is you might encounter 1 or 2 formations below the Grayson.

Great points/tips, thanks for explaining! I agree with you as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try the USGS Pocket Texas Geology and see if any better though it still won't work in narrow canyon or small outcrops it's usually spot on.

  • Thank You 1
  • I Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Shaun-DFW Fossils said:

Great points/tips, thanks for explaining! I agree with you as well.

Use the North Texas Fossils website to help with stratigraphy and fossils. Realize that the formation names may change in different parts of the area.

 

 

http://northtexasfossils.com

  • Thank You 1

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DPS Ammonite said:

Use the North Texas Fossils website to help with stratigraphy and fossils. Realize that the formation names may change in different parts of the area.

 

 

http://northtexasfossils.com

Thank you! I’ve enjoyed Lance Halls website and it’s helped me so the identification in the past, but I didn’t realize he had those maps. I found it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Lone Hunter said:

Try the USGS Pocket Texas Geology and see if any better though it still won't work in narrow canyon or small outcrops it's usually spot on.

Thanks, that’s a new one for me! I like that it’s free..I saved the link as a favorite.

  • Enjoyed 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...