DPING3312 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Human finger, minnisota, unbelievable ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Hunter Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Sorry but it's not a finger, I'm thinking it may be banded chert but wait for expert opinion. It's a darm good pseudo fingerprint though! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 (edited) Hi, I agree with @Lone Hunter, it’s not a finger even though nature has imitated it well. • Humans have appeared too recently on Earth to be truly fossilized. • Fingerprints are not as regular as what we see here, I think more of a fossil print (shell for example) and experts will intervene. • Imagine what you would see if you found an animal that had been dead for two weeks: all its soft parts would be rotting. The phenomenon of fossilization requires an extremely long time and does not allow to preserve the soft parts of an earth body. Coco Edited January 31 by Coco 1 ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPING3312 Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 Well I would definitely agree until today and some how I assure u this is the soft tissue fossilized I know it's absolutely amazing ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 You have already gotten some opinions on your claim. I also agree that this is not a fossilized human finger, fingerprint or soft tissue, but might just at least be a bivalve steinkern or imprint. Somehow assuring us that this is soft tissue is not a very convincing scientific approach to identification. But if you don't want to believe these opinions, then that's your choice. 2 Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPING3312 Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 I completely understand and if I was anyone hearing this I'd be saying the same thing ......I have an associates in general science myself and am a absolute rock lover and am very versed on time-lines of human evolution and with anything other than an extrem fluctuation in atmospheric and climate this wouldn't be possible but hear I stand holding what I have truly zero doubt is a humanish bone and even the bone marrow is fossilized its truly amazing thanks for your input I truly appreciate it .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Hunter Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Take it to a police station and ask them to analyze it, take it to a museum, I promise you it's not a finger. There is no bone morphology, why would flesh fossilize and not the bone? I know it looks convincing but it is impossible, but if you choose to ignore sciemce and follow your imagination so be it. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 If you’re so sure what it is, why do you come to us for our opinion and then refute it ? We are a scientific forum. A very large part of the members here are paleontology professionals or very enlightened amateurs with 20, 30, 40, even 50 years of experience ! It is up to you to believe what you want, but in this case do not expect to be given the answer you expect if it is incompatible with the science of geology or paleontology. Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranzBernhard Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 8 minutes ago, Lone Hunter said: Take it to a police station and ask them to analyze it Yes, this is what should be done with such a well preserved finger. Some crime seems to be involved. Franz Bernhard 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DPING3312 Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 Maybe so but I'm sure you guys will be hearing about this soon enough ...didn't mean to upset u I'm just telling you what it is and I can't help that it changes what you might have thought was (set in stone) lol but I'm just as astonished as you but don't take anything away from it it's absolutely a miracle that the world could preserve something for sp long but it has Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Ask Kay Scarpetta to help you... And of course we are waiting for the result of your investigation ! Coco ---------------------- OUTIL POUR MESURER VOS FOSSILES : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 1 (Poissons et sélaciens récents & fossiles) : ici Ma bibliothèque PDF 2 (Animaux vivants - sans poissons ni sélaciens) : ici Mâchoires sélaciennes récentes : ici Hétérodontiques et sélaciens : ici Oeufs sélaciens récents : ici Otolithes de poissons récents ! ici Un Greg... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranzBernhard Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 5 minutes ago, DPING3312 said: I'm sure you guys will be hearing about this soon enough Just now, Coco said: And of course we are waiting for the result of your investigation Yeah, in a peer-reviewed, paleontological journal. Franz Bernhard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Hunter Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 36 minutes ago, DPING3312 said: Maybe so but I'm sure you guys will be hearing about this soon enough ...didn't mean to upset u I'm just telling you what it is and I can't help that it changes what you might have thought was (set in stone) lol but I'm just as astonished as you but don't take anything away from it it's absolutely a miracle that the world could preserve something for sp long but it has There is no such thing as miracles in science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kane Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Real science cultivates its doubts and resists making absolute, certain statements. The OP would do well to place this under extreme scrutiny, and avoid the temptation to impose a wish for something to be true. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It could very well be modern, as in some form of impressionable material (such as clay) where a finger was pushed in during moulding to make what appears as an indent in the substance. I've removed your tag asking for value as that is not permitted here, as stated in the Forum rules. 3 ...How to Philosophize with a Hammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockwood Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 There are a great number of bivalve and brachiopod shells that have this pattern of growth. It's based on simple principals of physics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludwigia Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 2 hours ago, DPING3312 said: I'm sure you guys will be hearing about this soon enough Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger http://www.steinkern.de/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fossildude19 Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Pareidolia. Just because an item LOOKS like something, it doesn't mean that it IS that something. As stated, many things in nature produce this type of pattern. It is not a finger, or, in my opinion, any kind of fossil. I'm in agreement with banded chert. Topic will be locked, as further discussion is pointless. OP can take his item to a local Natural History Museum or University with a paleontologist or geologist, and tell them what he has found. I personally will not be waiting on the disappointing non-reveal that is coming. Or Not. Usually not. By the way, we are not astonished by this. We've all seen weird rocks. 1 5 Tim - VETERAN SHALE SPLITTER VFOTM --- APRIL - 2015 __________________________________________________ "In every walk with nature one receives far more than he seeks." John Muir ~ ~ ~ ~ ><))))( *> About Me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts