New Members Sauronitholestes07 Posted March 21 New Members Posted March 21 2.7mm long “raptor” tooth found in Garfield County, Montana. Isn’t curved and has serrations. Possibly enat tooth.
ThePhysicist Posted March 21 Posted March 21 An even smaller tooth than last time... same answer - indeterminate. What is an "enat"? Closest match is "morphotype 6" described in a paper last year - small, basal constriction, and fine serrations that may not persist to the apex. The authors note others referred similar teeth to Richardoestesia isosceles, and that the denticles resemble those of ziphosuchian crocodyliforms. ^ Mohr SR, Acorn JH, Currie PJ (2023) Putative avian teeth from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, are more likely from crocodilians. PLoS ONE 18(3): e0283581. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0283581 4 Forever a student of Nature
BirdsAreDinosaurs Posted March 21 Posted March 21 Reminds me a bit of Hadamasuchus teeth from the Kem Kem beds, so my best guess would also be crocodyliform . 1
jpc Posted March 21 Posted March 21 10 hours ago, ThePhysicist said: An even smaller tooth than last time... same answer - indeterminate. What is an "enat"? Closest match is "morphotype 6" described in a paper last year - small, basal constriction, and fine serrations that may not persist to the apex. The authors note others referred similar teeth to Richardoestesia isosceles, and that the denticles resemble those of ziphosuchian crocodyliforms. ^ Mohr SR, Acorn JH, Currie PJ (2023) Putative avian teeth from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, are more likely from crocodilians. PLoS ONE 18(3): e0283581. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0283581 I assumed that 'enat' is (misspelled) short for enantiornithes. Thanks for this paper. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now