Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • New Members
Posted

2.7mm long “raptor” tooth found in Garfield County, Montana. Isn’t curved and has serrations. Possibly enat tooth.IMG_2353.thumb.jpeg.69bac538908ede16ca99121900af05fa.jpegIMG_2352.thumb.jpeg.a9da6bc5252e1dc0f0d6229ad49bab0c.jpeg

Posted

Hmmmmm.... I wish I had an answer.  cool tooth.

Posted

An even smaller tooth than last time... same answer - indeterminate. What is an "enat"?

 

Closest match is "morphotype 6" described in a paper last year - small, basal constriction, and fine serrations that may not persist to the apex. The authors note others referred similar teeth to Richardoestesia isosceles, and that the denticles resemble those of ziphosuchian crocodyliforms.

Screenshot2024-03-21at12_24_32AM.thumb.png.9c637553a7b16ae81bb0b7afd9c396cd.png

^ Mohr SR, Acorn JH, Currie PJ (2023) Putative avian teeth from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, are more likely from crocodilians. PLoS ONE 18(3): e0283581. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0283581

  • I found this Informative 4

Forever a student of Nature

image.png.b91ce67f2541747809ca9464ef3e0fa6.png  image.png.91f16f76669e71e2b39cff25bd672bde.png  image.png.d9d37e4f54d24fd75a9c495d6f024bb8.png

Posted

Reminds me a bit of Hadamasuchus teeth from the Kem Kem beds, so my best guess would also be crocodyliform .

  • I found this Informative 1
Posted
10 hours ago, ThePhysicist said:

An even smaller tooth than last time... same answer - indeterminate. What is an "enat"?

 

Closest match is "morphotype 6" described in a paper last year - small, basal constriction, and fine serrations that may not persist to the apex. The authors note others referred similar teeth to Richardoestesia isosceles, and that the denticles resemble those of ziphosuchian crocodyliforms.

Screenshot2024-03-21at12_24_32AM.thumb.png.9c637553a7b16ae81bb0b7afd9c396cd.png

^ Mohr SR, Acorn JH, Currie PJ (2023) Putative avian teeth from the Late Cretaceous of Alberta, Canada, are more likely from crocodilians. PLoS ONE 18(3): e0283581. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0283581

I assumed that 'enat' is (misspelled) short for enantiornithes.

 

Thanks for this paper. 

 

  • I Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...