JamieLynn Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 A friend found out about my hobby of fossiking (particularly urchins) and says "oh, there are hundreds of the round urchins on my property, come on out!" So, I did and was initially disappointed to find out that what he thought were round urchins, were in fact algal fruiting bodies or porocystis globularis (as I discovered a while back when I first found the fossil forum, thinking I had some cool eggs....) So finding literally hundreds of these globularis was quite cool, but I wanted urchins! Now, also, there were urchins. Lots and lots and lots...of heart urchins. Which I like. A lot. But I also find them quite frequently where I am. I was wanting ROUND urchins! I havn't found but a few of those in my huntings. So I kept hunting. And was rewarded with a few small but nice phymosoma texanum round urchins. Yay!! And a mess of nice gastopods and bivlaves (some really adorable, yes, adorable, small deer heart clams) .All in all, a good days hunt! 1 www.fossil-quest.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFOOLEY Posted December 19, 2013 Share Posted December 19, 2013 Great finds! Urchins are pretty uncommon 'round my stomping grounds. I am always thrilled to find one. These that you found are wonderful. "I am glad I shall never be young without wild country to be young in. Of what avail are forty freedoms without a blank spot on the map?" ~Aldo Leopold (1887-1948) New Mexico Museum of Natural History Bulletins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanNREMTP Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 Nice findings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prem Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 I like heart urchins...rare in Florida. ---Prem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scylla Posted December 20, 2013 Share Posted December 20, 2013 All of those are rare in Long Island, you should be thrilled! Congrats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieLynn Posted December 20, 2013 Author Share Posted December 20, 2013 what is rare in Long Island is coveted in Texas and vice versa! www.fossil-quest.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missourian Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 I would be happy to find the algal things. They are so different than anything else one finds. Context is critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrangellian Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 Never seen or even heard of those algae things! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeroMike Posted December 21, 2013 Share Posted December 21, 2013 Very cool! Sounds like you not only found some nice fossils (not to mention the round urchins you was after) but a new site to hunt as well! " This comment brought to you by the semi-famous AeroMike" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieLynn Posted December 22, 2013 Author Share Posted December 22, 2013 yes! I can't wait to go back after some rains to see what else there is to find! www.fossil-quest.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bone2stone Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 (edited) Just thought I would revive this topic considering a post was made on another forum that just seemed not quite right. Jamie, You have some "tube worm" fossils posted that even though they seem to be tube worms they may be something entirely different. The ones you found in direct association may be the "stemming" of the Porocystis Globularis. The Globularis had to have had a means of growth that spawned the fruiting body. Thus the disassociated "broken" specimens may be just that, broken stems. The Globularis is an enigma or even a paradox specimen that has yet to be fully described by any satisfactory means. The extent of study has been limited to may be, could be, appears to be. Nothing that would point a finger to any conclusive description. I even use the term may be, There was a reply that had the "stems" identified first as crinoid stems then as a snail. Nerinea aquilinea. The picture of the Nerinea they replied with was for sale on Flea bay. I attempted to let her know that her specimens were not gastropods or crinoids but there was no convincing her otherwise. Then again, I'll say it again, may be stems to the Globularis. BTW: Has anyone given you any leads on your regular echinoids found in the Glen Rose Formation. The round or regular echinoids normally found in the Glen Rose are called "Loriolia Rosana" and "Loriolia Comanchei" although they may be one and the same. The Globator echinoids can be found in some areas of the Glen Rose and on occasion are quite abundant. I am surprised you have not come across a lens filled with them. If anyone has any more input on the identification "stems vs. fruiting" it would be fulfilling to actually see evidence giving credence to this enigma. Sponge, Algae or something entirely different. There is little or nothing to compare them with. Jess B. You can lead a horse to water etc...etc... Edited December 7, 2014 by bone2stone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erose Posted December 8, 2014 Share Posted December 8, 2014 Jamie, Nice specimens. The term for round urchins is "regular". I also think your Phymosomas may in fact be Loriolias although Phymosoma does occur in the Glen Rose. But that is also assuming you are in the Glen Rose. Everything you show there could have been found in the Walnut Fm. as well. Good stuff. Here is the paper you need to help identify your Glen Rose echinoids. It is probably the most complete paper on GR echinoids ever done and it is relatively current*. Echinoid diversity, preservation potential and sequence stratigraphical cycles in the Glen Rose Formation (early Albian, Early Cretaceous), Texas, USA Andrew B. Smith & William L. Rader Do a search and you will find a free link (or PM me and I will send it) or it may be n the FF library already. * Since this paper was published a handful of us have found at least three other echinoid genera not previously listed for the formation. Maybe one day they will be described. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now