Kasia Posted December 30, 2017 Posted December 30, 2017 It seems that the notorious T-rex was not only inaudible (there was already an article about it), but it also looked a little .... weird http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5218921/T-rex-tufty-hair-orange-eyebrows.html 3
Troodon Posted December 30, 2017 Posted December 30, 2017 Definitely more realistic than the feathered variety, still a bit odd. Hey if he's chasing you the only thing you're looking at is that jaw full of teeth. 1
Kasia Posted December 30, 2017 Author Posted December 30, 2017 21 minutes ago, Troodon said: Definitely more realistic than the feathered variety, still a bit odd. Hey if he's chasing you the only thing you're looking at is that jaw full of teeth. Dear fellow member, what did I say about aggressive creatures? Maybe he would be chasing someone just to give him a big hug and purr like a cat after being petted? After all, I can imagine this huge jaw stretched in a smile
Kasia Posted December 30, 2017 Author Posted December 30, 2017 I knew someone will finally believe that there was a totally different (cute) aspect of dinosaurs Troodon - welcome to the club!
LordTrilobite Posted December 30, 2017 Posted December 30, 2017 Pretty interesting. Though I'm wondering how they got the colour for the head. The only preserved skin with scales we know of right now is from the neck, hips and tail. I'm also wondering if they finally found some actual dinofuzz on a T. rex specimen. The article shows some images of the T.rex Tristan in Berlin. I know there were some ongoing studies on that specimen, but I have no clue as to what about. Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite
Troodon Posted December 30, 2017 Posted December 30, 2017 33 minutes ago, LordTrilobite said: Pretty interesting. Though I'm wondering how they got the colour for the head. The only preserved skin with scales we know of right now is from the neck, hips and tail. I'm also wondering if they finally found some actual dinofuzz on a T. rex specimen. The article shows some images of the T.rex Tristan in Berlin. I know there were some ongoing studies on that specimen, but I have no clue as to what about. Flat scales in the face were noted by Tom Carr in his Daspleto. paper Interesting blog on the subject where Carr and Bell challenge the fuzz notion. http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2017/06/revenge-of-scaly-tyrannosaurus.html 2
LordTrilobite Posted December 30, 2017 Posted December 30, 2017 Didn't that Daspletosaurus paper only talk about the skull itself and what that could tell about any possible scales? Not the actual remains of scales, or am I thinking of a different paper? But yeah, I'm interested to see what this new documentary is based on, of if it's just an educated guess. 1 Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite
caldigger Posted December 30, 2017 Posted December 30, 2017 But that's not how they've been portrayed in movies and Hollywood never lies! 1
Troodon Posted December 30, 2017 Posted December 30, 2017 2 hours ago, LordTrilobite said: Didn't that Daspletosaurus paper only talk about the skull itself and what that could tell about any possible scales? Not the actual remains of scales, or am I thinking of a different paper? But yeah, I'm interested to see what this new documentary is based on, of if it's just an educated guess. Correct the Daspleto paper talked about flat scales on the skull and proof of them. Bells paper was post cranial. Theories will continue to be brought forward and evolve, just the way it is when it's not clear cut.
Missourian Posted December 31, 2017 Posted December 31, 2017 Looks like a rocker. With those arms, though, he would probably have to stick to vocals. Context is critical.
Tidgy's Dad Posted December 31, 2017 Posted December 31, 2017 Mmmmmm. Interesting. I think that T. rex's prey would be so busy laughing at it's eyebrows that they'd collapse in a hysterical heap and be devoured. 1 Life's Good! Tortoise Friend.
LordTrilobite Posted January 3, 2018 Posted January 3, 2018 Link to the full documentary. After watching it I'd say it's a pretty decent documentary. It presents the reconstruction as mostly hypothetical, which it mostly is, so that's good. Though Nanotyrannus is not named at all, it's implied that this documentary is firmly in the camp of Nano and T. rex being one single species. There's not a lot of really new science in this. But I suppose it's a good refresher for those that haven't been keeping up with Tyrannosaur research. Also interesting to note they gave the rex lips, though they do not mention this. 2 Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite
Troodon Posted January 4, 2018 Posted January 4, 2018 23 hours ago, LordTrilobite said: Link to the full documentary. After watching it I'd say it's a pretty decent documentary. It presents the reconstruction as mostly hypothetical, which it mostly is, so that's good. Though Nanotyrannus is not named at all, it's implied that this documentary is firmly in the camp of Nano and T. rex being one single species. There's not a lot of really new science in this. But I suppose it's a good refresher for those that haven't been keeping up with Tyrannosaur research. Thomas Carr was not to pleased with the documentary 3
LordTrilobite Posted January 4, 2018 Posted January 4, 2018 Yeah I saw that. I suppose you'll get a different T. rex depending on which expert you ask. It seems at least some experts were involved in this documentary, like Larry Witmer and Dave Hone, who both definitely know their stuff. https://twitter.com/SerpenIllus/status/948290824877608961 1 Olof Moleman AKA Lord Trilobite
Bobby Rico Posted January 4, 2018 Posted January 4, 2018 Dinosaur Valley State Park T. rex tracks are incredible . Wow
Taogan Posted January 4, 2018 Posted January 4, 2018 On 03/01/2018 at 12:06 PM, LordTrilobite said: Link to the full documentary. After watching it I'd say it's a pretty decent documentary. It presents the reconstruction as mostly hypothetical, which it mostly is, so that's good. Though Nanotyrannus is not named at all, it's implied that this documentary is firmly in the camp of Nano and T. rex being one single species. There's not a lot of really new science in this. But I suppose it's a good refresher for those that haven't been keeping up with Tyrannosaur research. Also interesting to note they gave the rex lips, though they do not mention this. Of course T rex had lips. How do you think they kissed each other 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now