Jump to content

North Texas cracked open unknown


cthomp50

Recommended Posts

I’m not sure what I have here. I was thinking it was some type of worn ammonite... it’s been in my rock garden for years and I can’t remember for sure, but think I found it either up near Paris or west of Fort Worth.  

 

Regardless, I chipped away at it today to reveal the hidden side. But it was not what I was expecting. (And what are the two small encased stones?)

DC654F0F-B283-4041-879F-6A3D5FA24196.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The slightly curving bundles of tubes are interesting in photo below.

C9E0F8A4-A28F-4A15-9D4E-2C656A509AE9.jpeg

 

They might be Serpula worm tubes similar to the ones found in the Cretaceous Goodland Formation of north Texas. Maybe the serpula lived inside a large coiled mollusk. 

 

@FranzBernhard

 

See magnification of top photo. They look even more like the internal molds of serpula. The tubes are of various sizes and meander slightly. Note possible coiled Spirorbis worm tube.

EF29A81D-3687-4BF3-A3BC-5A7B6B16E0BF.jpeg

 

Photo below also also looks like serpula:

834DE99B-B670-4C1F-AB91-6B6A76A3E786.jpeg

 

Another possibility is some sort of coiled rudist. They have weird vesicular textures.

  • I found this Informative 3

My goal is to leave no stone or fossil unturned.   

See my Arizona Paleontology Guide    link  The best single resource for Arizona paleontology anywhere.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking maybe gastropod which was infested by tube worms after death and decomposition or maybe those regularly formed tubes are burrows? This is really intriguing. There is anyway a small gastropod (or tube worm?) in the last photo bottom left. As an afterthought, maybe it was originally a small nautilus.

  • I found this Informative 2

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interesting fossil. I would think hard and visit the place where I found it a few more times to find more. There's a lot going on in there. This may be worthy of scientific study.

 

 

Mark.

 

Fossil hunting is easy -- they don't run away when you shoot at them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very Interesting piece!

Dipleurawhisperer5.jpg          MOTM.png.61350469b02f439fd4d5d77c2c69da85.png

I like Trilo-butts and I cannot lie.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m with DPS Ammonite. Looks to me like the insides of a rudist, Edwards Formation. The curled, nautilus-like shape is the curved rudist. 

 

See: Edwards Formation Rudist Identification

 

Also see: An unknown Temnocidaris species from an unknown Texas formation with associated fauna

 

Rudists are one of the most commonly misidentified fossils, since they take on so many different shapes.

  • I found this Informative 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but I am not able not give an educated guess on this one.

7 hours ago, Mark Kmiecik said:

visit the place where I found it a few more times to find more

I would do this also, and make some transverse sections.

However, it is not clear to me, if there are some remnants of the actual shell or if the specimen is completely a steinkern.

Franz Bernhard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Heteromorph said:

I’m with DPS Ammonite. Looks to me like the insides of a rudist, Edwards Formation. The curled, nautilus-like shape is the curved rudist. 

 

See: Edwards Formation Rudist Identification

 

Also see: An unknown Temnocidaris species from an unknown Texas formation with associated fauna

 

Rudists are one of the most commonly misidentified fossils, since they take on so many different shapes.

 

5 hours ago, erose said:

Yes, rudist.

Then are those tubular forms remnants of the shell or part of the internal structure or?

 

Greetings from the Lake of Constance. Roger

http://www.steinkern.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ludwigia said:

 

Then are those tubular forms remnants of the shell or part of the internal structure or?

Yes, internal structure. Possibly some sort of vascular system. But these critters are long since extinct and I don't believe there any modern analogs to compare to.

  • I found this Informative 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For everything weird found in Texas, start with rudist.

Grüße,

Daniel A. Wöhr aus Südtexas

"To the motivated go the spoils."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think it is a rudist because the general shape and tubular shapes fit with what i saw serveral times with some rudists.

theme-celtique.png.bbc4d5765974b5daba0607d157eecfed.png.7c09081f292875c94595c562a862958c.png

"On ne voit bien que par le coeur, l'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux." (Antoine de Saint-Exupéry)

"We only well see with the heart, the essential is invisible for the eyes."

 

In memory of Doren

photo-thumb-12286.jpg.878620deab804c0e4e53f3eab4625b4c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...